Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%
Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Rockwell Automation's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 21 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,羅克韋爾自動化的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
- 業務的50%由前21名股東持有。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Rockwell Automation, Inc. (NYSE:ROK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 84% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着羅克韋爾自動化公司(紐交所:ROK),那麼你需要看看其股權登記的構成。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司84%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲益最多(如果出現下跌,則損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rockwell Automation.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關羅克韋爾自動化的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rockwell Automation?
機構持股告訴我們有關羅克韋爾自動化的信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that Rockwell Automation does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rockwell Automation's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到羅克韋爾自動化確實有機構投資者; 他們持有公司的股份。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅憑這一事實就斷定,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的觀點,股價可能會急劇下跌。因此,值得查看以下羅克韋爾自動化的歷史收入。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Rockwell Automation is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。羅克韋爾自動化並非由對沖基金擁有。目前,Vanguard Group,Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有12%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.0%的股份,第三大股東持有5.3%的股份。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Rockwell Automation
關於Rockwell Automation的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Rockwell Automation, Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$61m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據表明,羅克韋爾自動化的內部人士在自己的名下擁有不到1%的股份。由於公司規模龐大,我們不會指望內部人士擁有大量股票。他們共擁有6100萬美元的股票。看到至少有些內部人士持股總是件好事,但值得注意的是,也許值得查詢一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的一般公衆持有該公司的15%股份,因此無法輕易忽視。儘管擁有這樣的所有權,但如果不與其他大股東保持同步,這種所有權規模可能還不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Rockwell Automation you should know about.
我發現查看公司的股東很有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險。每家公司都會有風險,我們已經發現了羅克韋爾自動化的2個警示信號,您應該了解。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。