Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by California Water Service Group's (NYSE:CWT) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 8.9% Returns
Institutional Shareholders May Be Less Affected by California Water Service Group's (NYSE:CWT) Pullback Last Week After a Year of 8.9% Returns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in California Water Service Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders have sold recently
- 機構在california water service group的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重要影響
- 共有7家投資者擁有該公司的51%所有權。
- 近期內有內部人士出售股票
Every investor in California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
紐交所:CWT中的每位投資者都應該了解最有影響力的股東群體。 機構擁有85%股份,是公司中持股最多的群體。 換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上漲潛力(或下行風險)。
Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$118m last week. However, the 8.9% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.
機構投資者在上週公司市值下跌了11800萬美元后遭受了最大的損失。然而,8.9%的一年回報率可能有助於緩解他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失持謹慎態度。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of California Water Service Group, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究加州水務集團每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About California Water Service Group?
機構持股告訴我們有關加州水務集團的什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
California Water Service Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at California Water Service Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
加州水務集團在股東名冊上已經有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看一下加州水務集團以下的收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in California Water Service Group. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 18%. With 12% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.
由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意它們的偏好。我們注意到對於 california water service group,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是 BlackRock, 其擁有18%的所有權。第二大和第三大股東分別是 The Vanguard Group, Inc. 擁有12%和 t. Rowe Price Group, Inc. 擁有5.5%的已發行股份。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更深入的挖掘,發現前7名股東持有大約51%的股份,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of California Water Service Group
紐交所:CWt 公司內部股權所有情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of California Water Service Group in their own names. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$28m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,公司內部持有的加利福尼亞水務集團股份不到1%。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此董事會成員可能擁有公司的相當大利益,但擁有的比例並不多。 在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約2800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in California Water Service Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在加利福尼亞水務集團持有14%的股份。 這種持股規模雖然可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東的觀點不一致,可能還不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand California Water Service Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for California Water Service Group you should be aware of.
始終值得考慮公司中擁有股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解加利福尼亞水務集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉個例子:我們發現了加利福尼亞水務集團的2個警示信號,您應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。