share_log

We Think Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) Can Manage Its Debt With Ease

We Think Quanta Services (NYSE:PWR) Can Manage Its Debt With Ease

我們認爲廣達服務(紐交所:PWR)可以輕鬆管理其債務
Simply Wall St ·  10/26 20:09

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We note that Quanta Services, Inc. (NYSE:PWR) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

一些人認爲,投資者在考慮風險時,波動性而不是債務是最好的思考方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:'波動性遠非風險的同義詞。' 當你考慮一家公司有多大風險時,自然會關注它的資產負債表,因爲很多時候企業破產時都涉及債務。我們注意到廣達服務公司(NYSE:PWR)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否使公司變得更加風險。

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但如果企業無法償還貸款,則存在處於放貸人的憐憫之下。資本主義的一部分是"創造性破壞"的過程,而債務過重的公司往往會被放率無情地清算。雖然這種情況不太常見,但我們經常看到身負重債的公司因貸方強制其以低價籌措資本而不得不永久稀釋股東權益。當然,債務可能是企業特別是重資產企業的重要工具。所以,當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先要看現金和債務一起。

What Is Quanta Services's Debt?

廣達服務的債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Quanta Services had US$3.34b of debt in June 2024, down from US$4.23b, one year before. However, it also had US$518.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$2.83b.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但數據顯示,2024年6月,廣達服務的債務爲33.4億美元,比一年前的42.3億美元下降。然而,公司也有51810萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲28.3億美元。

big
NYSE:PWR Debt to Equity History October 26th 2024
紐交所:PWR 債務與股本歷史數據 2024年10月26日

How Strong Is Quanta Services' Balance Sheet?

廣達服務的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Quanta Services had liabilities of US$5.32b due within a year, and liabilities of US$4.03b falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$518.1m and US$5.66b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$3.17b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,廣達服務有一年內到期的負債爲53.2億美元,之後到期的負債爲40.3億美元。另一方面,它手頭有51810萬美元的現金和56.6億美元的一年內應收賬款。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出31.7億美元。

Since publicly traded Quanta Services shares are worth a very impressive total of US$45.7b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time.

由於公開交易的廣達服務股票總值爲457億美元,看起來這種負債水平不太可能構成重大威脅。但是,我們認爲值得關注其資產負債表的強度,因爲隨着時間的推移可能會發生變化。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

With a debt to EBITDA ratio of 1.6, Quanta Services uses debt artfully but responsibly. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 7.0 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. Also positive, Quanta Services grew its EBIT by 25% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Quanta Services can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

憑藉1.6的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率,廣達服務巧妙而負責地使用債務。而過去12個月的EBIT是其利息支出的7.0倍,與此相符。另外,廣達服務上一年的EBIT增長了25%,這將使未來更容易償還債務。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定廣達服務能否長期強化其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Quanta Services recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 83% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,雖然納稅人可能喜歡會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冰冷的現金。因此,我們顯然需要看一下該EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,廣達服務錄得的自由現金流價值爲其EBIT的83%,這比我們通常預期的要強。這使其有能力在需要時償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Quanta Services's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. And the good news does not stop there, as its EBIT growth rate also supports that impression! Zooming out, Quanta Services seems to use debt quite reasonably; and that gets the nod from us. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Quanta Services .

廣達服務將EBIt轉換爲自由現金流,表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo在14歲以下守門員面前進球一樣輕鬆處理其債務。好消息還不止於此,因爲其EBIt增長率也支持這種印象!總體來看,廣達服務似乎相當合理地使用債務;這受到我們的認可。雖然債務確實帶來風險,但如果明智利用,也可以帶來更高的股本回報。當您分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。因此,您應該注意我們發現的廣達服務的2個警告信號。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論