A Great Week That Adds to TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 45% Must Be Happy
A Great Week That Adds to TAL Education Group's (NYSE:TAL) One-year Returns, Institutional Investors Who Own 45% Must Be Happy
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in TAL Education Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 32% of TAL Education Group is held by insiders
- 機構在好未來集團的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
- 共有10位投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
- 32%的好未來集團股份由內部持有
A look at the shareholders of TAL Education Group (NYSE:TAL) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看一下好未來集團(紐交所:TAL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。擁有公司股份最多的群體,準確地說約爲45%,是機構。換句話說,該群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$273m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 8.2% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
公司上星期市值增加27300萬美元,機構投資者的前景看好。股東的一年回報率目前爲8.2%,上週的增長更是錦上添花。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TAL Education Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注好未來教育集團的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TAL Education Group?
機構持有權益告訴我們有關好未來教育集團的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in TAL Education Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at TAL Education Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在好未來教育集團擁有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲那些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡。但就像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變他們對某支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看好未來教育集團下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in TAL Education Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Bangxin Zhang with 28% of shares outstanding. Yachao Liu is the second largest shareholder owning 4.2% of common stock, and Morgan Stanley, Investment Banking and Brokerage Investments holds about 3.5% of the company stock. Interestingly, the second-largest shareholder, Yachao Liu is also Chief Operating Officer, again, pointing towards strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到,對於好未來集團,對沖基金並沒有意義重大的投資。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是CEO張邦新,持有28%的股份。劉亞超是第二大股東,擁有4.2%的普通股,而摩根士丹利、投資銀行和券商的投資持有大約公司股份的3.5%。有趣的是,第二大股東劉亞超也是首席運營官,再次表明公司前幾大股東擁有強勁的內部持股。
We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of TAL Education Group
好未來集團的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of TAL Education Group. Insiders own US$2.0b worth of shares in the US$6.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有好未來教育集團的股份比例相當可觀。內部持有價值20億美元的股份,這是一家市值62億美元的公司。這是相當有意義的。大多數人會說,這表明在這樣規模的公司中,股東之間有很好的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部持有人是在買入還是賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over TAL Education Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有24%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在好未來教育集團有一定的影響力。雖然這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for TAL Education Group that you should be aware of before investing here.
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了一項有關好未來集團的警告信號,您在投資之前應該注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。