Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Has A Somewhat Strained Balance Sheet
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE:RRX) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
當Howard Marks說到這一點時,他說,與其擔心股價波動,'我擔心的風險是永久性損失……我認識的每個實際投資者都擔心這一點。' 當我們考慮一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡看一下它使用的債務,因爲債務過載可能導致滅亡。 與許多其他公司一樣,Regal Rexnord Corporation(紐交所:RRX)使用債務。 但股東們應該擔心它使用的債務嗎?
When Is Debt A Problem?
什麼時候負債才是一個問題?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
通常情況下,只有當公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,即無法通過籌集資本或自身現金流償還債務時,債務才會成爲一個真正的問題。資本主義的一個組成部分是「創造性破壞」過程,由銀行家無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更常見的(但仍然昂貴的)情況是,公司只得以低廉的股價來稀釋股東,以使債務控制在可承受範圍之內。然而,通過取代稀釋,債務對於需要資本用於高回報增長的企業而言,可以是一種極其有用的工具。在考慮公司的債務水平時,第一步是考慮其現金和債務的總和。
What Is Regal Rexnord's Net Debt?
雷騎瑞仕集團(Regal Rexnord)的淨負債是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Regal Rexnord had US$5.70b of debt in June 2024, down from US$6.68b, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$510.4m in cash leading to net debt of about US$5.19b.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示雷騎瑞仕集團(Regal Rexnord)在2024年6月的債務爲57億美元,低於一年前的66.8億美元。反過來,它有51040萬美元的現金,淨負債約爲51.9億美元。
How Strong Is Regal Rexnord's Balance Sheet?
雷格爾雷諾德的資產負債表有多強?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Regal Rexnord had liabilities of US$1.23b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$7.01b due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$510.4m as well as receivables valued at US$892.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$6.84b.
深入了解最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到雷格爾雷諾德有12.3億美元的到期負債,超過12個月的負債爲70.1億美元。 抵消這些義務,它擁有51040萬美元的現金以及12個月內到期的89200萬美元應收賬款。 因此,它的負債比現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和多68.4億美元。
This deficit is considerable relative to its very significant market capitalization of US$11.2b, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on Regal Rexnord's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其112億美元的非常龐大的市值,這個赤字相當可觀,因此這確實表明股東應該密切關注雷格爾雷諾德對債務的使用。 這表明,如果公司需要緊急增加資產負債表,股東很可能會受到嚴重稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過查看淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比以及計算其利息支出由收益前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋的程度來度量一家公司的債務負載相對於其收益能力的程度。此方法的優點在於我們同時考慮了債務的絕對量(以淨債務爲EBITDA)以及與該債務相關的實際利息支出(以其利息覆蓋倍數計算)。
While Regal Rexnord's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.2) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.8, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Fortunately, Regal Rexnord grew its EBIT by 6.4% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Regal Rexnord's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
雷格爾雷諾德的負債/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率(4.2)表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息覆蓋率非常低,僅爲1.8,表明槓桿率很高。 因此,股東可能應該意識到利息支出似乎最近真正影響到業務。 幸運的是,雷格爾雷諾德去年的EBIt增長了6.4%,相對於收入,其債務在緩慢減少。 毫無疑問,我們最多從資產負債表中了解債務。 但最終決定雷格爾雷諾德未來能否維持健康資產負債表的將是未來收入,而不是其他任何因素。 因此,如果您想知道專家的看法,您可能會發現分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Regal Rexnord produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 68% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.
最後,企業需要有自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不足以做到這一點。 因此,邏輯的步驟是查看EBIt與實際自由現金流匹配比例。 在過去三年中,雷格爾雷諾德產生了相當可觀的自由現金流,相當於其EBIt的68%,這正是我們所預期的。 這筆堅實的現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
Regal Rexnord's struggle to cover its interest expense with its EBIT had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. For example its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was refreshing. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Regal Rexnord is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Regal Rexnord is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
Regal Rexnord爲了支付利息支出而掙扎,讓我們對其資產負債表實力產生了疑慮,但我們考慮的其他數據點相對彌補。例如,其將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流的能力令人耳目一新。綜合考慮以上所有方面,我們認爲Regal Rexnord由於其債務而成爲一項有一定風險的投資。並非所有風險都是壞事,如果成功償還,它可以提升股價回報,但這種債務風險值得記在心頭。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是開始的明顯地方。但最終,每家公司都可能有存在於資產負債表之外的風險。請注意,Regal Rexnord在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警示信號,您應該知曉...
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。