share_log

Northern Trust Corporation's (NASDAQ:NTRS) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.1% Over Last Week

Northern Trust Corporation's (NASDAQ:NTRS) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 6.1% Over Last Week

北方信託公司(納斯達克股票代碼:NTRS)高機構持股自有其表現,股價持續走強,上漲6.1%上週。
Simply Wall St ·  10/25 02:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Northern Trust implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在北方信託的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司的大部分股份,佔有52%的所有權
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

A look at the shareholders of Northern Trust Corporation (NASDAQ:NTRS) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 84% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察納斯達克交易所(NASDAQ:NTRS)北方信託公司的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最有權勢。擁有公司最多股份的集團,準確地說約爲84%,是機構。換句話說,該集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。

Last week's 6.1% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The one-year return on investment is currently 69% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週的6.1%漲幅意味着機構投資者處於積極的一面,即使公司展現了強勁的長期趨勢。投資回報率目前爲69%,上週的漲幅將會更受歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Northern Trust.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型股東可以告訴我們關於北方信託的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:NTRS Ownership Breakdown October 24th 2024
納斯達克股票交易所:NTRS所有權拆分2024年10月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northern Trust?

機構持股告訴我們有關北方信託的信息。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Northern Trust. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Northern Trust, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在北方信託擁有相當大比例的持股,這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售股票,常見的情況是看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查北方信託的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記得考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqGS:NTRS Earnings and Revenue Growth October 24th 2024
納斯達克: NTRS 2024年10月24日收入和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Northern Trust is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.7% of common stock, and FMR LLC holds about 5.9% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同對董事會的決定產生重大影響。北方信託並不被對沖基金所擁有。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有11%的所有權。BlackRock, Inc.是第二大股東,持有7.7%的普通股,而FMR LLC持有該公司約5.9%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 52% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查後,我們發現前13名股東在該公司擁有的股份總計爲52%,這表明沒有任何單一股東對該公司擁有重要控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Northern Trust

北方信託的內部股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Northern Trust Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$265m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告說,內部人員擁有北方信託公司的股份。 內部人士持有價值26500萬美元的股份。 大多數人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會利益的良好一致性。 不過,也許值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Northern Trust. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔有14%的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對北方信託擁有一定程度的影響力。 儘管擁有相當大比例的股權,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Northern Trust has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is potentially serious) we think you should know about.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但有其他更重要的因素。 例如,風險 - 北方信託存在2個警告信號(其中1個可能是嚴重的),我們認爲您應該知道。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論