share_log

With 82% Institutional Ownership, Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ:LULU) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 82% Institutional Ownership, Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ:LULU) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有82%機構持股的Lululemon Athletica Inc.(納斯達克:LULU)是大型機構的最愛
Simply Wall St ·  10/21 23:35

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lululemon Athletica implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 14 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • 機構在lululemon athletica的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有着重大影響
  • 前14名股東持有該公司50%的股權。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

If you want to know who really controls Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ:LULU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着lululemon athletica股份有限公司(納斯達克:LULU),那麼您就必須看看其股權登記冊的構成。機構持有82%的股份,在該公司擁有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該組織將獲益最多(或者在出現下行時損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lululemon Athletica.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了lululemon athletica的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:LULU Ownership Breakdown October 21st 2024
NasdaqGS:LULU 2024年10月21日所有權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lululemon Athletica?

機構持股告訴我們關於lululemon athletica的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lululemon Athletica. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lululemon Athletica, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在lululemon athletica擁有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者之間的某種可靠性。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查lululemon athletica的過去收入軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住也有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:LULU Earnings and Revenue Growth October 21st 2024
納斯達克上市:lululemon athletica第四季度2024業績:收入和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lululemon Athletica. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,實際上機構擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要權力。我們注意到,對於lululemon athletica,對沖基金並沒有具有有意義的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有9.6%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.7%的流通股,第三大股東持有7.4%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 14 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前14名股東合計持有該公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Lululemon Athletica

lululemon athletica內部人員持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Lululemon Athletica Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$1.3b. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告,內部股東確實擁有lululemon athletica股份。內部股東持有價值13億美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看最近這些內部股東是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。雖然持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 4.1%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私營公司擁有已發行股份的4.1%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得研究擁有這些私營公司的人。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司對公共公司擁有股份感興趣。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論