share_log

Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Altice USA, Inc. (NYSE:ATUS), and the Recent 5.7% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them

Insiders Are the Top Stockholders in Altice USA, Inc. (NYSE:ATUS), and the Recent 5.7% Drop Might Have Disappointed Them

內部人士是 altice usa 公司 (紐交所:ATUS) 的最大股東,最近股價下跌5.7%,可能會讓他們感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  10/20 21:54

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Altice USA's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
  • Institutions own 35% of Altice USA
  • Altice USA具有重要的內部股權,表明對公司擴張具有固有興趣
  • 前9大股東持有公司的51%股份。
  • 機構擁有Altice USA的35%

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Altice USA, Inc. (NYSE:ATUS), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 37% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着Altice USA,了解業務的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司37%的所有權。換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 5.7%.

上週,內部人遭受了最大的損失,因爲該股票下跌了5.7%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Altice USA.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關altice usa的信息。

big
NYSE:ATUS Ownership Breakdown October 20th 2024
紐交所:ATUS所有權分佈2024年10月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Altice USA?

關於altice usa,機構持股告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Altice USA. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Altice USA's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在altice usa中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總是存在它們會進行'集體交易'的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到altice usa的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事的內容總是更多的。

big
NYSE:ATUS Earnings and Revenue Growth October 20th 2024
紐交所:ATUS 2024年10月20日的盈利和營業收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Altice USA. Patrick Drahi is currently the largest shareholder, with 35% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 4.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.3% by the third-largest shareholder.

對於Altice usa,對沖基金沒有太多持股。Patrick Drahi目前是最大的股東,持有35%的流通股。第二大股東持有約4.9%的流通股,緊隨其後的是第三大股東持有3.3%的所有權。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Altice USA

Altice usa的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Altice USA, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$544m stake in this US$1.5b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有Altice USA, Inc.相當比例的股份。看到內部人員在這家價值15億美元的企業中持有價值5,4400萬美元的股份是非常有趣的。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏查看內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司28%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策方面左右陣腳取勝,但他們仍然可以對公司策略產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 4 warning signs for Altice USA (2 are significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了Altice USA的4個警告信號(其中2個很重要!),在投資這裏之前,你應該意識到這些。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論