Individual Investors Invested in Rezolve AI Limited (NASDAQ:RZLV) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$337m Market Cap Decline
Individual Investors Invested in Rezolve AI Limited (NASDAQ:RZLV) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's US$337m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in Rezolve AI indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 46% ownership
- Insiders own 27% of Rezolve AI
- Rezolve AI個人投資者持有的大量股權表明他們共同在經營和業務策略方面擁有更大的話語權
- 共有8位投資者持有該公司的大多數股份,佔股46%
- 內部持有Rezolve AI 27%的股權
A look at the shareholders of Rezolve AI Limited (NASDAQ:RZLV) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看Rezolve AI Limited(納斯達克:RZLV)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體實力最強。持有最大股份的群體是個人投資者,他們擁有54%的股權。換句話說,該群體最有可能(或最有可能)從投資公司中獲利(或蒙受損失)。
While insiders who own 27% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$1.2b last week,individual investors took the most losses.
上週市值下跌至12億美元后,持有27%股份的內部人士面臨壓力,個人投資者承受了最大損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Rezolve AI, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Rezolve AI的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rezolve AI?
機構持股缺失告訴我們有關Rezolve AI的什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Rezolve AI, for yourself, below.
一家公司沒有機構持有股份可能有各種原因。通常,規模小、新上市的公司不會吸引基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理無法在該公司建立有意義的頭寸。另一方面,專業投資者可能正避開某家公司,因爲他們認爲這不是最適合投資的地方。機構投資者可能覺得該業務的歷史增長並不令人印象深刻,或者可能存在其他因素。您可以自行查看Rezolve AI過去的營業收入表現,參考下文。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Rezolve AI. Igor Lychagov is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 17% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.7% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Daniel Wagner is the owner of 2.2% of the company's shares.
對Reslove人工智能的對沖基金持有的股份不多。 Igor Lychagov目前是最大的股東,持有17%的股份。 作爲背景,第二大股東持有約17%的股份,其次是第三大股東持有4.7%的股份。此外,CEO Daniel Wagner擁有公司股份的2.2%。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 8 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
深入查看我們的所有權數據顯示,前8位股東共持有註冊股份的一半以下,表明有許多小股東,沒有任何一個股東擁有絕對控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
儘管我們需要研究一個公司的機構所有權數據是有道理的,但也需要研究分析師的情緒來了解市場趨勢。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該股票的分析師報道,所以該公司可能不受廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Rezolve AI
Reslove人工智能的內部所有權情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Rezolve AI Limited. Insiders own US$326m worth of shares in the US$1.2b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在Rezolve AI有限公司中持有大量股份。內部人士擁有價值32600萬美元的股份,佔該價值爲12億美元的公司。這相當有意義。大多數人會說,這顯示了與股東的很好一致,尤其是在這家規模的公司。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 54% of Rezolve AI shares. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,共同持有Rezolve AI股份的54%。這種所有權規模賦予了來自一般公衆的投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以並且很可能影響執行薪酬、股利政策和擬議業務收購的決定。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 19%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司股份的19%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過私營公司持有公共公司的利益,而不是作爲個人。雖然很難得出任何大膽的結論,但它值得作爲進一步研究的領域加以注意。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 5 warning signs for Rezolve AI (of which 4 don't sit too well with us!) you should know about.
我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。比如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們已經發現Rezolve AI有5個警示信號(其中4個對我們來說不太好!)你應該知道。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。