share_log

'Veterans Dept. Investigating Acadia Healthcare For Insurance Fraud; Several Federal Agencies Are Investigating Whether The Large Chain Of Psychiatric Hospitals Held Patients Without Medical Justification' - NY Times

'Veterans Dept. Investigating Acadia Healthcare For Insurance Fraud; Several Federal Agencies Are Investigating Whether The Large Chain Of Psychiatric Hospitals Held Patients Without Medical Justification' - NY Times

《紐約時報》:退伍軍人事務部調查阿卡迪亞醫療保健涉嫌保險欺詐;多個聯邦機構正在調查這家大型精神病醫院連鎖機構是否未經醫療證明而扣留患者。
Benzinga ·  02:54

The Veterans Affairs Department is investigating whether Acadia Healthcare, one of the country's largest chains of psychiatric hospitals, is defrauding government health insurance programs by holding patients longer than is medically necessary, according to three people with knowledge of the inquiry.

退伍軍人事務部正在調查阿卡迪亞醫療保健是否存在欺詐政府醫療保險計劃的行爲,該公司是全國最大的精神病醫院連鎖機構之一,據三位知情人士透露。

The investigation, led by the agency's inspector general, comes three weeks after Acadia told investors that it was facing scrutiny for its admissions practices from several other federal investigators, including prosecutors in Manhattan and a grand jury in Missouri. The company, which relies on government insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid for much of its revenue, said it was also expecting to receive inquiries from the Securities and Exchange Commission and other agencies.

此次調查由機構的審計長領導,發生在阿卡迪亞告訴投資者公司面臨來自數個其他聯邦調查人員,包括曼哈頓的檢察官和密蘇里州的大陪審團對其入院實踐進行審查三週後。該公司的營業收入大部分依賴於像醫療保險和醫療補助這樣的政府保險計劃,並表示預計將收到證券交易委員會和其他機構的詢問。

Acadia told investors that it was "fully cooperating with authorities and, at this time, cannot speculate on whether the outcome of these investigations will have any impact on its business or operations." The company has denied claims that it was improperly holding patients and has said that all decisions about care are made by licensed medical professionals.

阿卡迪亞告訴投資者公司「全力配合有關部門,目前無法推測這些調查結果是否會對其業務或運營產生任何影響。」該公司否認了扣留患者的指控,並表示所有與醫療保健有關的決定均由持牌醫療專業人士做出。

The Veterans Affairs Department did not immediately respond to questions about the new investigation.

退伍軍人事務部尚未立即回應有關這項新調查的問題。

The New York Times reported in September that Acadia was holding patients against their will in ways that appeared to violate state laws. The Times reported that some patients arrived at emergency rooms seeking routine mental health care but then were sent to Acadia facilities and locked in. The company's employees often held patients until their insurance coverage ran out, even when there was no medical justification.

《紐約時報》去年九月報道稱,阿卡迪亞以違反州法的方式扣留患者。時報報道稱,一些患者前往急診尋求常規心理健康護理,但隨後被送到阿卡迪亞設施並被鎖定。該公司員工經常將患者扣留至其保險覆蓋結束,即使沒有醫療理由。

The Times article was based on official complaints, court records and interviews with patients, as well as more than 50 current and former Acadia employees.

該時報文章基於官方投訴、法庭記錄以及對患者、以及50多名現任和前任阿卡迪亞員工的採訪。

Last month, Acadia agreed to pay almost $20 million to settle Justice Department claims that the company had defrauded government health insurers by holding patients longer than medically necessary and admitting people who didn't need to be there. Acadia did not acknowledge wrongdoing in that case, which covered conduct from 2014 through 2017.

上個月,阿卡迪亞同意支付將近2000萬美元以了結司法部的索賠,稱公司通過扣留患者超過醫療所需時間和收治無需在那裏的人,欺詐政府醫療保險商。阿卡迪亞在那起案件中並沒有承認有錯,該案件涵蓋了2014年至2017年的行爲。

The fresh round of investigations are focused on recent events. The veterans agency is looking into whether Acadia billed insurance programs for patients who were stable enough to be released and did not need intensive inpatient care, according to two of the people with knowledge of the investigation, who requested anonymity because it has not been made public.

最新一輪調查主要集中在最近發生的事件上。有知情人士透露,退伍軍人管理局正在調查阿卡迪亞是否向穩定到可以出院且不需要密集住院護理的患者計費保險項目。這兩位知情人士要求匿名,因爲該調查還未公開。

Several former Acadia employees in Georgia and Missouri have also recently been interviewed by agents from the F.B.I. and the inspector general's office of the Health and Human Services Department.

喬治亞州和密蘇里州的多名前阿卡迪亞員工最近還接受了來自聯邦調查局和衛生與人類服務部辦公室的特工的訪問。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論