share_log

Capital Allocation Trends At Gravity (NASDAQ:GRVY) Aren't Ideal

Capital Allocation Trends At Gravity (NASDAQ:GRVY) Aren't Ideal

重力社(納斯達克:GRVY)的資本配置趨勢並不理想
Simply Wall St ·  10/18 20:40

What are the early trends we should look for to identify a stock that could multiply in value over the long term? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. However, after investigating Gravity (NASDAQ:GRVY), we don't think it's current trends fit the mold of a multi-bagger.

我們應該關注哪些早期趨勢,以識別那些能夠長期增值的股票?除其他因素外,我們希望看到兩個關鍵點;首先,資本運作回報率(ROCE)不斷增長,其次,公司資本運作規模擴大。如果您看到這種情況,通常意味着這家公司擁有出色的商業模式和豐富的盈利再投資機會。然而,在調查納斯達克上市公司重力社(NASDAQ:GRVY)後,我們認爲其目前的趨勢並不符合多袋特徵。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Gravity:

對於那些不清楚什麼是ROCE的人來說,它衡量的是公司從資本運作中所能創造的稅前利潤數量。分析師使用這個公式爲重力社計算ROCE:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。

0.18 = ₩94b ÷ (₩614b - ₩97b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.18 = ₩940億 ÷ (₩6140億 - ₩97億)(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

Thus, Gravity has an ROCE of 18%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 11% generated by the Entertainment industry.

因此,重力社的ROCE爲18%。獨立看來,這是一個標準回報率,但比娛樂行業產生的11%要好得多。

big
NasdaqGM:GRVY Return on Capital Employed October 18th 2024
NasdaqGM:GRVY 2024年10月18日的資本運作回報率

While the past is not representative of the future, it can be helpful to know how a company has performed historically, which is why we have this chart above. If you'd like to look at how Gravity has performed in the past in other metrics, you can view this free graph of Gravity's past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

雖然過去並不能代表未來,但了解公司歷史表現可能會有幫助,這就是爲什麼我們有上面這張圖表。如果您想查看Gravity過去在其他指標上的表現,可以查看Gravity過去的收益、營業收入和現金流的免費圖表。

How Are Returns Trending?

綜合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其資本利用率所產生的回報。考慮到股票過去五年保持穩定,如果其他指標也不錯,則可能存在機會。因此,進一步研究這家公司並確定這些趨勢是否會持續是合理的。

On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Gravity doesn't inspire confidence. To be more specific, ROCE has fallen from 52% over the last five years. Given the business is employing more capital while revenue has slipped, this is a bit concerning. This could mean that the business is losing its competitive advantage or market share, because while more money is being put into ventures, it's actually producing a lower return - "less bang for their buck" per se.

表面上看,Gravity的ROCE趨勢並不讓人信心滿滿。更具體地說,過去五年中,ROCE已經從52%下降至現在。考慮到業務正在使用更多資本但營業收入卻在下滑,這令人有些擔憂。這可能意味着業務正在失去競爭優勢或市場份額,因爲雖然投入更多資金到項目中,但實際上帶來了更低的回報 - 可以說是「每花一元效果更差」。

On a related note, Gravity has decreased its current liabilities to 16% of total assets. That could partly explain why the ROCE has dropped. Effectively this means their suppliers or short-term creditors are funding less of the business, which reduces some elements of risk. Some would claim this reduces the business' efficiency at generating ROCE since it is now funding more of the operations with its own money.

相關的是,Gravity已將其流動負債減少到總資產的16%。這可能部分解釋了爲什麼ROCE下降了。實際上,這意味着他們的供應商或短期債權人正在爲業務提供的資金更少,從而減少了一些風險。有些人會聲稱這減少了業務用於自有資金運營操作的效率,因爲現在更多地用自有資金支持業務操作。

What We Can Learn From Gravity's ROCE

我們可以從Gravity的ROCE中學到什麼

From the above analysis, we find it rather worrisome that returns on capital and sales for Gravity have fallen, meanwhile the business is employing more capital than it was five years ago. The market must be rosy on the stock's future because even though the underlying trends aren't too encouraging, the stock has soared 110%. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.

從以上分析中,我們發現Gravity的資本回報率和銷售額下降相當令人擔憂,與此同時,業務使用的資本比五年前還多。市場對該股票未來看好,因爲儘管潛在趨勢並不太令人鼓舞,但該股票已飆升110%。儘管如此,我們對基本面並不太舒服,所以我們暫時會遠離這隻股票。

If you're still interested in Gravity it's worth checking out our FREE intrinsic value approximation for GRVY to see if it's trading at an attractive price in other respects.

如果您仍然對重力社感興趣,值得查看我們免費的GRVY內在價值估算,以查看其是否以其他方面以有吸引力的價格交易。

While Gravity isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

儘管重力社的回報率並不是最高的,但可以查看這份免費的公司名單,這些公司在股權回報率和資產負債表方面獲得了高回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論