share_log

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 61% of the Company

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 61% of the Company

zoom視頻通訊公司(納斯達克:ZM)受到機構持有者青睞,他們持有公司61%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  10/17 22:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Zoom Video Communications' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Zoom Video Communications is 15%
  • 鑑於機構在股票中的大量持有,zoom視頻通訊的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 共有18位投資者持有該公司超過50%的股份。
  • zoom視頻通訊的內部持股比例爲15%

If you want to know who really controls Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 61% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想要了解誰真正控制着zoom視頻通訊公司(納斯達克:ZM),那麼您將需要查看其股東名冊的構成。持有公司最多股份的機構約爲61%,換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zoom Video Communications.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看zoom視頻通訊的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:ZM Ownership Breakdown October 17th 2024
NasdaqGS:Zm所有權分析 2024年10月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zoom Video Communications?

機構持股告訴我們有關zoom視頻通訊的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zoom Video Communications. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Zoom Video Communications' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

如您所見,機構投資者在zoom視頻通訊中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某支股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看一下zoom視頻通訊的歷史收入記錄是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:ZM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 17th 2024
NasdaqGS:Zoom視頻通訊盈利和營業收入增長2024年10月17日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zoom Video Communications. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 7.7% of shares outstanding. With 7.3% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Eric Yuan and BlackRock, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Eric Yuan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。我們注意到,對於Zoom視頻通訊,對沖基金並沒有意義重大的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有7.7%的流通股份。分別持有7.3%和5.0%的流通股份的是Eric Yuan和BlackRock, Inc.,他們是第二和第三大股東。Eric Yuan是第二大股東,同時也擔任首席執行官。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東名冊來看,我們可以看到18位最高股東控制了50%的股權,這意味着沒有單個股東掌控股權的多數利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Zoom Video Communications

Zoom視頻通訊的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zoom Video Communications, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$21b, and insiders have US$3.2b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

Zoom視頻通訊公司股東中似乎有相當大比例爲內部人員。 公司市值僅爲210億美元,而內部人員擁有32億美元的股票。 這是相當可觀的。 大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。 您可以查看這張免費圖表,顯示內部人員最近的交易。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Zoom Video Communications. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

佔有24%的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Zoom視頻通訊具有一定的影響力。 儘管這一所有權規模相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東的意見不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Zoom Video Communications , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入了解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,考慮投資風險這個永恒的威脅。我們已經發現對zoom視頻通訊存在1個警示,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論