share_log

Talkspace, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TALK) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 18% Over Last Week

Talkspace, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TALK) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 18% Over Last Week

Talkspace公司(納斯達克股票代碼:TALK)的高度機構所有權證明了其自身實力,股價持續表現出色,上漲了18%,比上週高。
Simply Wall St ·  10/16 21:44

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Talkspace implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 13 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構對Talkspace的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 前13大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

Every investor in Talkspace, Inc. (NASDAQ:TALK) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

納斯達克:TALK的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 機構持有公司42%的股份,在公司中擁有最大的股份。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 18% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 30% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

結果,上週公司股價上漲18%,制度投資者獲得了最大回報。 股東的一年回報率目前爲30%,上週的收益更是錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Talkspace.

在下面的圖表中,我們將聚焦於Talkspace的不同持股群體。

big
NasdaqCM:TALK Ownership Breakdown October 16th 2024
納斯達克: TALk 2024年10月16日的所有權結構分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Talkspace?

機構持股告訴我們有關Talkspace的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Talkspace. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Talkspace's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Talkspace中擁有相當大的股份。 這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。 當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們參與到'擁擠交易'中的風險。 當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速售出股票。 在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險會更高。 您可以在下面查看Talkspace的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加精彩。

big
NasdaqCM:TALK Earnings and Revenue Growth October 16th 2024
納斯達克CM:TALk2024年10月16日收益和營業收入增長

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.7% of Talkspace. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is NVP Associates, LLC with 8.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.7% and 5.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們的數據顯示,對話空間的6.7%是對沖基金所有。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能會非常活躍和積極主動。許多人尋找能夠推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是NVP Associates,LLC,持有8.7%的流通股份。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股份的6.7%和5.1%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

在我們的所有權數字中仔細看看,前13名股東擁有的股權合計爲50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Talkspace

對話空間的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Talkspace, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$20m worth of the US$446m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說內部人士確實擁有Talkspace, Inc.的股份。作爲個人,內部人士共同擁有價值2,000萬美元的4,4600萬美元公司。這至少顯示了某種對齊。您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 33% stake in Talkspace. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在Talkspace擁有33%的股份。雖然這個群體不能必然決定事情,但確實對公司的運營有真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Talkspace. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有Talkspace 14%的股份。 這表明他們可能在關鍵政策決策中起到影響力。 一些投資者可能會受到這一點的鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵市場看到公司的價值。 或者,這些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論