With 64% Ownership in ATyr Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
With 64% Ownership in ATyr Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies aTyr Pharma's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
- Insiders have bought recently
- 機構持有數量顯著較高,這意味着atyr pharma的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
- 內部人士最近購買了股票。
A look at the shareholders of aTyr Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 64% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看atyr pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATYR) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。在該公司持有最多股份的群體中,具體來說佔大約64%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$61m in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 100% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,公司獲得了6100萬美元的市值增長,對於機構投資者來說,情況正在好轉。目前投資回報率爲100%,上週的增長是值得歡迎的。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of aTyr Pharma.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注atyr pharma的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About aTyr Pharma?
機構持股告訴我們有關atyr pharma的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
aTyr Pharma already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at aTyr Pharma's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
atyr pharma已經有機構投資者持有股份登記。的確,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經觀察過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面atyr pharma的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in aTyr Pharma. Our data shows that Federated Hermes, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 4.0% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能強烈影響董事會的決定。對於atyr pharma,對沖基金沒有持有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,Federated Hermes, Inc.是最大的股東,持有19%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約14%和4.0%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of aTyr Pharma
atyr pharma內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
We can report that insiders do own shares in aTyr Pharma, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$208m, and insiders have US$5.5m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以報告說,atyr pharma公司的內部人員確實擁有股票。該公司的市值僅爲20800萬美元,內部人員名下擁有550萬美元的股票,顯示出至少有一定的一致性。您可以點此查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 34% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通大衆,包括零售投資者,持有該公司34%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這樣的持有量不足以左右政策決策方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand aTyr Pharma better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with aTyr Pharma (at least 1 which is concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得思考。但要更好地了解atyr pharma,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,考慮投資風險這個始終存在的威脅。我們已經確定了atyr pharma的3個警示信號(至少有1個令人擔憂),理解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。