share_log

With 62% Ownership of the Shares, Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 62% Ownership of the Shares, Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有股份62%的spotify technology S.A. (紐交所:SPOT) 受機構所有者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  10/15 02:14

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Spotify Technology's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders own 18% of Spotify Technology
  • 機構持有大量股份意味着spotify technology的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前12個股東持有業務的51%。
  • 內部持有spotify technology18%的股份

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Spotify Technology S.A. (NYSE:SPOT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 62% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正控制着Spotify Technology S.A. (紐交所:SPOT),了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。 機構持有62%的股份是該公司中最大的股份。 換句話說,該機構面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Spotify Technology, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Spotify Technology的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:SPOT Ownership Breakdown October 14th 2024
紐交所:SPOt所有權拆分2024年10月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Spotify Technology?

機構所有權告訴我們有關Spotify Technology的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Spotify Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Spotify Technology, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在Spotify Technology中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的可信度。但是,在依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證時最好保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,很常見看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查Spotify Technology的過去盈利軌跡(下方)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:SPOT Earnings and Revenue Growth October 14th 2024
紐交所:SPOt收入和營業收入增長2024年10月14日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Spotify Technology is not owned by hedge funds. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Sven Lorentzon (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 11% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Tencent Holdings Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and Baillie Gifford & Co. holds about 8.0% of the company stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Daniel Ek directly holds 6.7% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會決策。騰訊控股不是對沖基金所有。根據我們的數據,我們推斷最大的股東是斯文·洛倫松(也擔任首席主管)擁有公司11%的股份。當內部人擁有公司的大部分股份時,通常被認爲是一個好跡象,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到一位公司內部人扮演關鍵利益相關者的角色。騰訊控股有限公司是第二大股東,擁有公司8.3%的普通股,而Baillie Gifford&Co.擁有約8.0%的公司股票。此外,公司CEO丹尼爾·埃克直接持有公司總股份的6.7%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

看一下股東註冊表,我們可以看到前12大股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握多數股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Spotify Technology

spotify technology的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Spotify Technology S.A.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$13b stake in this US$75b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們的信息顯示,內部人員在 Spotify Technology S.A. 擁有重要持股。看到內部人員在這家價值750億美元的公司中持有130億美元的股份十分有趣。看到這個投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in Spotify Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在 Spotify Technology 持有12%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可能還不足以影響政策決定向他們有利,但他們仍然能夠對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 8.3% of Spotify Technology. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

據我們觀察,上市公司持有spotify technology 8.3%的股份。很難確定,但這表明它們存在交織的業務利益。這可能是戰略性持股,因此值得密切關注所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Spotify Technology that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現spotify technology存在2個警告信號,您應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論