KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that KLA Corporation (NASDAQ:KLAC) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
一些人認爲,投資者應該將波動性而不是債務視爲風險評估的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」所以顯而易見的是,當您考慮任何特定股票的風險時,您需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到KLA Corporation(納斯達克股票代碼:KLAC)的業務中確實使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務到底帶來了多大風險?
When Is Debt Dangerous?
債務何時有危險?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
一般來說,只有當企業不能輕易償還其債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資本還是利用自身的現金流。最終,如果公司無法執行其法律義務償還債務,股東可能會一無所獲。雖然這不太常見,但我們經常看到負債的公司永久地稀釋股東的權益,因爲貸款人會強制以危機價格提高他們的資本。當然,債務對於企業來說也是很重要的工具,特別是對於資本密集型企業來說。考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的就是查看其現金和債務的總體情況。
What Is KLA's Debt?
KLA的債務是什麼?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of June 2024 KLA had US$6.63b of debt, an increase on US$5.89b, over one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$4.50b, its net debt is less, at about US$2.13b.
您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,截至2024年6月,KLA的債務爲663億美元,較一年前的589億美元有所增加。然而,由於其現金儲備爲450億美元,淨債務較少,約爲213億美元。
How Healthy Is KLA's Balance Sheet?
KLA的資產負債表健康狀況如何?
The latest balance sheet data shows that KLA had liabilities of US$4.66b due within a year, and liabilities of US$7.40b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$4.50b in cash and US$1.90b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$5.66b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,KLA的短期負債爲46.6億美元,長期負債爲74億美元。與此相抵,它有45億美元的現金和19億美元的應收賬款,這些應收賬款在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多56.6億美元。
Since publicly traded KLA shares are worth a very impressive total of US$107.7b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.
由於上市的KLA股票總價值高達1077億美元,看起來這種水平的負債不太可能構成重大威脅。但我們認爲有足夠的負債,因此我們強烈建議股東繼續監控資產負債表的情況。
In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.
爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。
KLA's net debt is only 0.53 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 24.1 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. But the other side of the story is that KLA saw its EBIT decline by 9.0% over the last year. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if KLA can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
KLA的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.53倍。它的EBIT覆蓋其利息費用達到驚人的24.1倍。因此,我們對其極爲保守的債務使用感到放心。但事情的另一面是,KLA去年的EBIT下降了9.0%。如果收入繼續以這種速度下降,公司可能會在處理債務負擔時遇到越來越大的困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終業務未來的盈利能力將決定KLA是否能夠隨着時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現對分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有興趣。
But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, KLA recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 83% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That puts it in a very strong position to pay down debt.
但我們的最後考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要現金。因此,我們始終檢查多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。在過去三年中,KLA記錄的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的豐厚83%,這比我們通常預期的要強。這使其處於非常有利的位置,可以償還債務。
Our View
我們的觀點
KLA's interest cover suggests it can handle its debt as easily as Cristiano Ronaldo could score a goal against an under 14's goalkeeper. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. When we consider the range of factors above, it looks like KLA is pretty sensible with its use of debt. While that brings some risk, it can also enhance returns for shareholders. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for KLA you should be aware of.
KLA的利息覆蓋表明它可以像Cristiano Ronaldo面對一名14歲以下守門員時進球一樣輕鬆處理債務。但更嚴肅的是,我們對其EBIt增長率感到有些擔憂。當我們考慮以上一系列因素時,KLA在債務使用上似乎非常明智。儘管會帶來一些風險,但也可以提升股東的回報。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中得知最多關於債務的信息。但最終,每家公司都可能存在一些超出資產負債表之外的風險。舉例說明:我們發現了一項KLA的1個警示信號,您應該注意。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。