Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 80% of the Company
Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 80% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Science Applications International's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 9 shareholders
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 考慮到機構在股票中所佔比重較大,科學應用國際公司的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
- 前9大股東持有該業務的50%。
- 最近有內部人員購買。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Science Applications International Corporation (NASDAQ:SAIC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制着科學應用國際公司(納斯達克:SAIC),重要的是要了解該業務的所有權結構。在該公司中持有最多股份的是機構,準確地說,大約80%的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或在出現下跌情況下損失最多)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Science Applications International.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Science Applications International的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Science Applications International?
機構持股告訴我們有關Science Applications International的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Science Applications International does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Science Applications International's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Science Applications International確實有機構投資者;而他們持有公司的一部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴於這個事實,因爲機構有時也會投資不良,就像所有人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看Science Applications International的下面營業收入歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Science Applications International. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 10% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.6% and 9.0% of the stock.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過公司一半的股份,因此可以共同行使重要權力。我們注意到對於科學應用國際,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.擁有10%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約9.6%和9.0%的股份。
On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 9 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.
進一步調查發現,超過一半的公司股份由前9大股東持有,這表明較大股東的利益在一定程度上被小股東平衡了。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Science Applications International
科學應用國際的內部持有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Science Applications International Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$71m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有Science Applications International Corporation不到1%的股份。請記住這是一家大公司,內部持有價值7100萬美元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。可以認爲,最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Science Applications International. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Science Applications International持有19%的股份。雖然這種所有權規模可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Science Applications International better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Science Applications International (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable) that you should be aware of.
考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解science applications international,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了science applications international的2個預警信號(其中1個讓我們有點不舒服),您應該注意。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。