share_log

With 79% Institutional Ownership, Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 79% Institutional Ownership, Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有79%機構持股的markel group公司(紐交所:MKL)備受大佬們青睞
Simply Wall St ·  10/11 19:56

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Markel Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 48% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構對Markel Group的大量持股意味着他們對該公司的股價有重要影響
  • 該公司前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 48%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

A look at the shareholders of Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看Markel Group Inc. (NYSE:MKL) 的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。 擁有最大餅圖的是持有79%的機構。 換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲取最多(或損失最多)

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Markel Group.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Markel Group不同所有權群體的細節。

big
NYSE:MKL Ownership Breakdown October 11th 2024
紐交所:MKL 2024年10月11日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Markel Group?

機構持股告訴我們關於Markel Group的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Markel Group. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Markel Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Markel Group中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出某隻股票,很可能會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查Markel Group的過往盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:MKL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 11th 2024
紐交所:MKL 營業收入和收入增長2024年10月11日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Markel Group. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.0% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.8% and 4.3% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能共同影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金在Markel Group中沒有重大投資。根據我們的數據,可以看到最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有9.0%的股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.8%和4.3%的股份。

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Markel Group

Markel Group內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Markel Group Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$325m. Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士在markel group inc中擁有一些股份。 內部人擁有價值32500萬美元的實質性股權。 大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會利益良好契合。 但還是值得檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在拋售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Markel Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有19%股權的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在markel group具有一定的影響力。 儘管擁有相當大的所有權,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Markel Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現了解公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。 比如,投資風險這個永恒存在的幽靈。 我們已經確定了markel group 1個警示標誌,並且理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論