share_log

IDACORP, Inc. (NYSE:IDA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 85% of the Company

IDACORP, Inc. (NYSE:IDA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 85% of the Company

IDACORP公司(紐交所:IDA)主要由擁有該公司85%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  10/11 19:06

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies IDACORP's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構擁有的股份比例極高,暗示idacorp的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 前15名股東持有該公司50%的業務。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

If you want to know who really controls IDACORP, Inc. (NYSE:IDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 85% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道誰真正控制着IDACORP公司(紐交所:IDA),那麼您就需要看一下其股東名冊的構成。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有着85%的股權。換句話說,這個集團從他們對該公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或者損失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of IDACORP.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了IDACORP的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:IDA Ownership Breakdown October 11th 2024
NYSE:IDA 2024年10月11日的所有權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About IDACORP?

機構持有權告訴我們關於IDACORP的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in IDACORP. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see IDACORP's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在IDACORP中持有相當數量的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會弄錯。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於'交易擁擠'的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能爭相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看IDACORP的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

big
NYSE:IDA Earnings and Revenue Growth October 11th 2024
NYSE:IDA 營收和營業收入增長 2024年10月11日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in IDACORP. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 11%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 3.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此他們可能強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金對IDACORP的投資並不多。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock, Inc.,擁有11%的股權。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股,第三大股東持有3.8%的股權。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 15 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東名冊上可以看出,50%的所有權由前15名股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有大多數的所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of IDACORP

IDACORP的內部所有權情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that IDACORP, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$24m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,idacorp股東內部擁有公司不到1%的股份。這是一家大公司,因此即使擁有少量股份也可以在董事會和股東之間建立利益一致。在這種情況下,內部人士擁有價值2400萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買賣和交易同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 14% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over IDACORP. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆擁有公司14%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對idacorp具有一定的影響力。雖然這個集團不能決定一切,但確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for IDACORP you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.

我發現查看公司所有者非常有趣。但要真正洞悉,我們也需要考慮其他信息。就拿我們發現的idacorp的3個警示標誌來說,你也應該注意,其中1個很重要。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論