Public Companies Among Gyre Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GYRE) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 6.9% Last Week
Public Companies Among Gyre Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:GYRE) Largest Shareholders, Saw Gain in Holdings Value After Stock Jumped 6.9% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Gyre Therapeutics by public companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The largest shareholder of the company is GNI Group Ltd. with a 69% stake
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 公共公司對吉爾治療公司的重大控制意味着普通公衆有更多權力影響公司管理和治理相關決策。
- 該公司最大的股東是GNI集團有限公司,持有69%的股份。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Gyre Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:GYRE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 69% to be precise, is public companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着Gyre Therapeutics, Inc. (納斯達克: GYRE),重要的是要了解公司的所有權結構。 擁有公司中最多股份的團體,準確地說約佔69%,是公共公司。 換句話說,該團體面臨着最大的上升潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, public companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit US$1.1b market cap following a 6.9% gain in the stock.
因此,上週公共公司以股票漲幅6.9% 達到11億美元市值,共同取得最高分。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Gyre Therapeutics, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究吉爾生物技術的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gyre Therapeutics?
關於Gyre Therapeutics的機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Since institutions own only a small portion of Gyre Therapeutics, many may not have spent much time considering the stock. But it's clear that some have; and they liked it enough to buy in. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.
由於機構只擁有吉爾生物技術的一小部分股份,許多人可能沒有花太多時間考慮這支股票。但很明顯,有些人確實有興趣,並且喜歡這支股票足夠多以至於買入。如果業務從這裏變得更強大,我們可能會看到更多機構有興趣購買的情況。有時當一些大機構同時想購買某隻股票時,我們會看到股價上漲。下面的歷史收益和營業收入數據可能有助於考慮更多機構投資者是否會買入這支股票。當然,還有許多其他因素需要考慮。
Gyre Therapeutics is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is GNI Group Ltd. with 69% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 3.1% and 3.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that the second and third-largest shareholders are also President and Chairman of the Board, respectively, meaning that the company's top shareholders are insiders.
Gyre Therapeutics不是對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是GNI集團有限公司,持有的股份中有69%。由於擁有如此巨大的股權,我們推斷他們對公司未來有重大控制。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有未流通股份的3.1%和3.0%。需要注意的是,第二大和第三大股東也分別是董事長和總裁,這意味着公司的主要股東是內部人員。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但考慮到分析師的看法,了解風向也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此它可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Gyre Therapeutics
Gyre Therapeutics的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Gyre Therapeutics, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$68m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,Gyre Therapeutics, Inc.的內部股東持有一些股份。 這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。 內部股東持有價值6800萬美元的股份(按目前價格計算)。 大多數人會說,這表明股東與董事會之間的利益一致。 儘管如此,還是值得檢查一下那些內部人員是否一直在賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
With a 24% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Gyre Therapeutics. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
擁有24%股權的普通大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在Gyre Therapeutics有一定的影響力。 儘管這一所有權規模相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 69% of Gyre Therapeutics. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
我們認爲,上市公司擁有Gyre Therapeutics的69%股權。 這可能是戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。 可能是它們已進行了部分分拆。 這種持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Gyre Therapeutics (including 1 which is significant) .
雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,您應該了解關於Gyre Therapeutics的3個警告跡象(包括1個重要跡象)。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果您更喜歡覈對具有潛在優越財務狀況的其他公司,則不要錯過此免費的備有強大財務數據支持的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。