UOL Group Limited's (SGX:U14) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 32% Stake, While 30% Is Held by Private Companies
UOL Group Limited's (SGX:U14) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 32% Stake, While 30% Is Held by Private Companies
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in UOL Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 5 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutions own 22% of UOL Group
- 個人投資者在UOL集團擁有的相當大股權表明,他們共同在管理和業務策略方面有更大發言權
- 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
- 機構擁有UOL集團22%的股權
Every investor in UOL Group Limited (SGX:U14) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 32% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
新加坡交易所:U14的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。個人投資者擁有32%的股份,在公司中佔有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者如果市場出現低迷),這個群體將獲益最多(或者損失最多)。
And private companies on the other hand have a 30% ownership in the company.
另一方面,私人公司擁有該公司30%的所有權。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about UOL Group.
讓我們仔細觀察不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於華業集團的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About UOL Group?
機構持股告訴我們關於華業集團的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
UOL Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of UOL Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
華業集團已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者之間具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖出售某支股票,導致股價大幅下跌也並不罕見。因此,值得查看華業集團的過往收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
UOL Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wee Investments Pte Ltd with 16% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 14% and 8.5% of the stock.
華業集團不是由對沖基金持有。通過我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Wee Investments Pte Ltd,持有16%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約14%和8.5%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of UOL Group
華業集團的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of UOL Group Limited. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own S$22m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
根據我們最新的數據,內部持有UOL集團有限公司不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們尚未掌握的公司結構間接持有利益。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部持有價值2200萬新元的股份。絕對價值可能比比例份額更重要。看到至少有一些內部持股始終是件好事,但值得查看這些內部人員是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
考慮到不同的股東群體對一家公司的股份持有情況,總是值得去思考。但是,爲了更好地了解韻達股份,我們需要考慮其他許多因素。事實證明:我們發現了韻達股份的1個警示信號,您需要意識到該信號。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 30%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,山西振東製藥股份有限公司的私人公司持有公司30%的股份。僅從這一事實,很難得出任何結論,所以值得研究一下誰擁有這些私人公司。有時,內部人員或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司擁有某個上市公司的股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 16% of UOL Group stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
目前,上市公司持有華業集團16%的股份。很難確定,但這表明它們有交織的業務利益。這可能是一項戰略性持股,所以值得留意該空間的股權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with UOL Group (including 1 which is potentially serious) .
我發現查清楚誰擁有一家公司很有趣。但爲了真正洞悉,我們也需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解我們發現的華業集團的3個警示信號(其中1個可能嚴重)。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。