Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company
Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 85% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Comcast's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 22 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構持股高意味着康卡斯特的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 22個投資者持有該公司的51%所有權。
- 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。
If you want to know who really controls Comcast Corporation (NASDAQ:CMCSA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 85% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道誰真正控制着康卡斯特公司(納斯達克股票代碼:CMCSA),那麼你需要查看其股東註冊組成。持有該公司股份數量最多的是機構,確切地說,大約85%的股份歸機構所有。換句話說,這個團體在投資該公司方面可能獲得最多的利潤(或者承擔最大的風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Comcast.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注康卡斯特的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Comcast?
機構所有權對康卡斯特有何啓示?可以看出康卡斯特確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這表明公司在投資界中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者所謂的認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在一種「擁擠交易」的風險。如果這樣的交易失敗了,多個方面可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到康卡斯特的歷史收入和營業收入,但要記住,故事總會更多。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that Comcast does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Comcast, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到康卡斯特確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構投資者也會犯錯,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,很常見會導致股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查康卡斯特的過往收益軌跡(以下)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Comcast is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.3% and 6.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Brian Roberts directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。康卡斯特不是對沖基金持有。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是"梵蒂岡集團",擁有9.6%的股份。其次,"黑石集團"和"卡普爾研究與管理公司"分別擁有8.3%和6.4%的股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司的CEO布賴恩·羅伯茨直接持有總股份的0.9%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 22 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到前22名股東控制着51%的所有權,這意味着沒有任何單一股東對所有權擁有絕對優勢。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of Comcast
康卡斯特的內幕所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Comcast Corporation. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$1.5b of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有康卡斯特公司股份不到1%。由於規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部持有大部分股票。他們共擁有15億美元的股票。可以說最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 14% stake in Comcast. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在康卡斯特持有14%的股份。雖然這一群體通常無法做出決定,但確實可能對公司的運行產生實質影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Comcast better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Comcast .
始終值得考慮不同的股東群體。但要更好地了解康卡斯特,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們發現的與康卡斯特有關的1個警示標誌。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。