share_log

Is Terex (NYSE:TEX) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Terex (NYSE:TEX) Using Too Much Debt?

Terex (紐交所:TEX)是否使用了太多債務?
Simply Wall St ·  10/05 21:32

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that Terex Corporation (NYSE:TEX) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

有人說,作爲投資者,思考風險的最佳方式是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:"波動性與風險遠非同義詞。" 當您審視一個公司有多大風險時,自然會考慮到該公司的資產負債表,因爲債務往往是業務破產時所涉及的問題。我們可以看到泰力克公司(紐交所: TEX)在業務中確實使用了債務。但股東們應該擔心它使用債務嗎?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業不能償還其債權人,則必須接受其懲罰。最終,如果公司不能履行法定還債義務,股東可能一無所獲。然而,更常見的(但仍然痛苦的)情況是,公司需要以低價格籌集新的股本資本,從而永久性削弱股東權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理其債務,並獲得自身利益。在我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Terex's Debt?

泰力克債務是什麼?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Terex had US$665.6m of debt in June 2024, down from US$736.7m, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$319.3m, its net debt is less, at about US$346.3m.

您可以點擊下方的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示泰力克在2024年6月擁有66560萬美元的債務,比一年前的73670萬美元有所減少。然而,由於其有31930萬美元的現金儲備,淨債務更少,約爲34630萬美元。

big
NYSE:TEX Debt to Equity History October 5th 2024
紐交所: TEX債務權益歷史記錄2024年10月5日

How Healthy Is Terex's Balance Sheet?

特雷克斯的資產負債表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Terex had liabilities of US$1.09b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$867.7m due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$319.3m as well as receivables valued at US$719.4m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$916.9m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

根據最近報告的資產負債表,特雷克斯有109億美元的負債到期,以及8,677萬美元的長期負債。 抵消這些負債,它擁有3,193萬美元的現金以及價值7,194萬美元的應收款項,到12個月內到期。 因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收款項總額多出9,169萬美元。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Terex has a market capitalization of US$3.40b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

雖然這看起來很多,但並不算太糟糕,因爲特雷克斯的市值爲34億美元,所以如果有需要,它可能通過增加資本來加強資產負債表。 但我們絕對希望留意是否有跡象表明其債務帶來過多風險。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

Terex's net debt is only 0.51 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 11.7 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. Fortunately, Terex grew its EBIT by 4.3% in the last year, making that debt load look even more manageable. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Terex's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

特雷克斯的淨債務僅爲其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的0.51倍。其EBIt輕鬆覆蓋利息支出,是其11.7倍。 因此,可以說它受到的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠威脅更多。 幸運的是,特雷克斯去年的EBIt增長了4.3%,使該債務負擔看起來更爲可控。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。 但是將決定特雷克斯未來能否維持健康資產負債表的能力,更多的是未來收入。 因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現此關於分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Terex recorded free cash flow of 29% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,雖然稅務部門可能崇拜會計利潤,但債權人只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,值得檢查EBIt中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。 查看最近三年的數據,特雷克斯的自由現金流佔其EBIt的比例爲29%,這低於我們的預期。 在償還債務方面,這並不理想。

Our View

我們的觀點

Terex's interest cover was a real positive on this analysis, as was its net debt to EBITDA. Having said that, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow somewhat sensitizes us to potential future risks to the balance sheet. Considering this range of data points, we think Terex is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. We've identified 1 warning sign with Terex , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Terex的利息覆蓋率在此分析中表現不錯,其淨債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤之比也是一個正面因素。話雖如此,其息稅前利潤轉化爲自由現金流的能力使我們對資產負債表潛在未來風險變得更加敏感。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲Terex有能力管理其債務水平。話雖如此,負擔還是相當沉重的,我們建議任何股東都要時刻關注。資產負債表顯然是你分析債務時需要關注的領域。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。我們已經確定了一項對Terex的警告,理解這些因素應成爲你投資過程的一部分。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論