share_log

With 73% Institutional Ownership, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 73% Institutional Ownership, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有73%機構持股的克利夫蘭克利夫公司(紐交所:CLF)是大型投資者中的熱門選擇
Simply Wall St ·  10/05 21:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Cleveland-Cliffs' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 20 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有的大部分股份,克利夫蘭克裏夫的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 總共有20位股東持有該公司的50%股權
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

If you want to know who really controls Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 73% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着克利夫蘭克裏夫公司(紐交所:CLF),那麼您必須看看其股東登記表的構成。 持有最大股份的是機構,佔有73%的所有權。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cleveland-Cliffs.

讓我們仔細觀察一下,不同類型的股東能告訴我們什麼有關克利夫蘭克裏夫。

big
NYSE:CLF Ownership Breakdown October 5th 2024
紐交所:CLF所有權拆分2024年10月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cleveland-Cliffs?

機構所有權告訴我們關於克利夫蘭克裏夫的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Cleveland-Cliffs already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cleveland-Cliffs' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

克利夫蘭克裏夫已經在股東名冊上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且他們喜歡它。但像任何其他人一樣,他們也可能錯誤。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的克利夫蘭克裏夫營業收入歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:CLF Earnings and Revenue Growth October 5th 2024
紐交所:克利夫蘭克裏夫2024年10月5日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Cleveland-Cliffs. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 10% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that C. Goncalves, the CEO has 1.1% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應該注意,實際上機構擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要權力。對克利夫蘭克裏夫,對沖基金持有的股份不多。 目前,BlackRock, Inc.是公司最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。 第二大股東持有約10%的流通股,緊隨其後的第三大股東持有4.9%的流通股。此外,我們發現首席執行官C. Goncalves名下擁有1.1%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 20 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們所有權數據的進一步觀察表明,前20大股東持有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Cleveland-Cliffs

克利夫蘭克裏夫的內部股權所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$114m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告內部人擁有克利夫蘭克裏夫公司的股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重大一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約1.14億美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。如果您想探討內部人一致性問題,可以 點擊這裏 查看內部人是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Cleveland-Cliffs. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在克利夫蘭克裏夫公司持有25%的股份。雖然這一所有權比例相當大,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Cleveland-Cliffs is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is significant...

在考慮擁有公司的不同群體時是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,克利夫蘭克裏夫在我們的投資分析中顯示出3個警示信號,其中1個是顯著的...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論