Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
Here's Why Caleres (NYSE:CAL) Has A Meaningful Debt Burden
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. As with many other companies Caleres, Inc. (NYSE:CAL) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
David Iben說得很好,'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。' 因此,很明顯當你考慮到任何給定股票的風險時,你需要考慮到債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。就像許多其他公司一樣,Caleres,Inc. (紐交所:CAL) 使用債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司變得風險更高。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來了什麼風險?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
負債可以幫助企業,直到企業無法通過新的資本或自由現金流償還負債的時候爲止。在最壞的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。然而,一種更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是公司必須以低廉的股票價格稀釋股東,以控制負債。當然,負債可以是企業中重要的工具,特別是在資本密集型企業中。當我們考慮公司使用負債時,我們首先查看現金和負債的結合。
What Is Caleres's Debt?
Caleres的債務是多少?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Caleres had US$146.5m of debt in August 2024, down from US$244.0m, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$51.8m, its net debt is less, at about US$94.7m.
您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但其中顯示的是,截至2024年8月,Caleres的債務爲14650萬美元,低於一年前的24400萬美元。然而,由於該公司有5180萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,約爲9470萬美元。
How Healthy Is Caleres' Balance Sheet?
Caleres的資產負債表情況如何?
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Caleres had liabilities of US$860.4m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$546.1m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$51.8m as well as receivables valued at US$156.3m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.20b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最近的資產負債表看出,Caleres有一筆86040萬美元的短期到期負債,以及54610萬美元的長期到期負債。 抵消這些義務,它擁有5180萬美元的現金以及價值15630萬美元的應收款項,其中12個月內到期。 因此,其負債總額超過了12億美元的現金和短期應收款項的合計。
Given this deficit is actually higher than the company's market capitalization of US$1.13b, we think shareholders really should watch Caleres's debt levels, like a parent watching their child ride a bike for the first time. In the scenario where the company had to clean up its balance sheet quickly, it seems likely shareholders would suffer extensive dilution.
考慮到這一逆差實際上高於公司113億美元的市值,我們認爲股東們確實應該密切關注Caleres的債務水平,就像父母第一次看孩子騎自行車一樣。 如果公司不得不迅速清理其資產負債表的情況下,股東們很可能會遭受嚴重的稀釋。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。
Caleres's net debt is only 0.39 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 12.1 times the size. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. On the other hand, Caleres saw its EBIT drop by 2.5% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Caleres's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Caleres的淨債務僅爲其EBITDA的0.39倍。 而其EBIt輕鬆覆蓋了利息費用,規模爲12.1倍。 因此,我們對其超保守的債務使用感到非常放心。 另一方面,Caleres在過去十二個月中看到其EBIt下降了2.5%。 如果收入繼續以這種速度下降,公司可能在處理其債務負擔方面遇到越來越大的困難。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。 但最終決定Caleres未來能否保持健康資產負債表的將是未來的收入,超過其他因素。 因此,如果您關注未來,您可以查看此免費報告,展示分析師的利潤預測。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Caleres recorded free cash flow of 49% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能欽佩會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冰冷的現金。 因此,值得檢查EBIt中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。 查看最近三年,Caleres記錄的自由現金流爲其EBIt的49%,低於我們的預期。 這種弱勢的現金轉換使得處理負債更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
Even if we have reservations about how easily Caleres is capable of staying on top of its total liabilities, its interest cover and net debt to EBITDA make us think feel relatively unconcerned. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that Caleres is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. Not all risk is bad, as it can boost share price returns if it pays off, but this debt risk is worth keeping in mind. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Caleres you should know about.
即使我們對Caleres如何輕鬆地處理其總負債持有保留意見,其利率期貨和淨債務與EBITDA之比使我們覺得相對不擔心。從以上提到的所有角度來看,我們認爲Caleres作爲一家債務結果較爲風險投資。並非所有風險都是壞的,因爲它可以在付出後提高股價回報,但這種債務風險值得銘記在心。毫無疑問,我們最多從資產負債表中了解到債務情況。然而,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表內,遠非如此。這些風險可能很難發現。每家公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了Caleres的1個警示跡象,您應該知道。
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。