share_log

SunOpta Inc.'s (NASDAQ:STKL) Institutional Investors Lost 7.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

SunOpta Inc.'s (NASDAQ:STKL) Institutional Investors Lost 7.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

sunopta公司(納斯達克:STKL)的機構投資者上週損失了7.0%,但從長期收益中受益
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 19:56

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in SunOpta implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 11 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在SunOpta的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重要影響
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of SunOpta Inc. (NASDAQ:STKL), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着SunOpta Inc. (納斯達克: STKL),重要的是了解公司的所有權結構。擁有公司股份數量最多的是機構,準確地說,大約佔公司股份的88%。換句話說,這個集團將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或失去最多)利益。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$772m last week. Still, the 96% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

機構投資者是上週最受影響的群體,因爲公司的市值跌至77200萬美元。儘管一年漲幅達96%,可能有助於減輕他們的總體損失。但他們可能會對未來的損失保持警惕。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SunOpta.

讓我們更近距離地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關sunopta的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:STKL Ownership Breakdown October 4th 2024
納斯達克STKL股權拆分2024年10月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SunOpta?

機構的持有告訴我們有什麼關於SunOpta?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that SunOpta does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at SunOpta's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到sunopta確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的sunopta收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:STKL Earnings and Revenue Growth October 4th 2024
納斯達克GS:STKL2024年10月4日盈利和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in SunOpta. Brookfield Corporation is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 4.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者持有大部分已發行股份,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。在SunOpta公司,對沖基金持有的股份不多。Brookfield Corporation目前是最大的股東,持有已發行股份的17%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.4%和4.4%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前11名股東持有的股份總計50%,意味着沒有單個股東掌握多數股份。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of SunOpta

SunOpta的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in SunOpta Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$772m, and insiders have US$16m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會感興趣地了解到,內部持有sunopta股票。該公司的市值僅爲77200萬美元,內部人士名下持有1600萬美元的股份。這至少顯示了某種程度上的一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over SunOpta. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有10%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成的普通大衆對sunopta有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右他們的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for SunOpta you should know about.

我發現了解一家公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入見解,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮風險。每家公司都存在風險,我們已經發現了 sunopta 的 2 個警示信號,您應該了解。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論