share_log

The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 71% of the Company

The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 71% of the Company

the trade desk公司(納斯達克:TTD)受到機構持有者青睞,他們持有該公司的71%股份
Simply Wall St ·  10/04 18:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Trade Desk's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,the trade desk的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of The Trade Desk, Inc. (NASDAQ:TTD) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下the trade desk, inc. (納斯達克:TTD)的股東,就能知道哪個群體最有權勢。 機構持有公司最多的股份,佔有71%。 換句話說,這個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Trade Desk.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於the trade desk的信息。

big
NasdaqGM:TTD Ownership Breakdown October 4th 2024
NasdaqGM:TTD所有權分佈2024年10月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Trade Desk?

機構持股給我們關於Trade Desk的什麼提示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Trade Desk. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Trade Desk's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在the trade desk中佔有相當大的份額。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了這隻股票,並且喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的the trade desk營業收入歷史數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGM:TTD Earnings and Revenue Growth October 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:TTD盈利和營收增長2024年10月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Trade Desk is not owned by hedge funds. With a 8.8% stake, CEO Jeffrey Green is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.6% and 7.5% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股票,董事會可能必須關注他們的偏好。交易桌不屬於對沖基金所有。首席執行官傑弗裏·格林持有8.8%的股份,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約8.6%和7.5%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

通過股權調查,我們發現前13名股東在公司中擁有50%的股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Trade Desk

Trade Desk的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in The Trade Desk, Inc.. Insiders own US$5.1b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到內部持有The Trade Desk, Inc.的股份。內部持有價值51億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Trade Desk. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

擁有20%的股份,大衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對the trade desk有一定影響力。雖然這個群體不能確定地決定一切,但肯定對公司的運行有着實質性的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Trade Desk .

我覺得看一家公司的股東是非常有趣的。但爲了真正洞悉情況,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該注意到我們發現的與the trade desk有關的1個警示信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論