share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as ConocoPhillips' (NYSE:COP) Recent US$5.1b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as ConocoPhillips' (NYSE:COP) Recent US$5.1b Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取激烈措施,因爲康菲石油(紐交所:COP)最近的51億美元下跌加劇了長期損失
Simply Wall St ·  00:35

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in ConocoPhillips implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構在康菲石油的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響
  • 共有21名投資者持有該公司的大部分股權,佔有50%的所有權
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

康菲石油(紐交所:COP)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有83%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個團體將獲益最多(或者如果經濟出現不濟,則損失最大)。

And so it follows that institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$122b last week after a 4.0% drop in the share price. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 7.8% for shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in ConocoPhillips' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,在公司市值上週下跌4.0%至1220億美元后,機構投資者是受影響最大的群體。這批投資者可能特別關注目前的損失,這給股東帶來了一年損失7.8%。通常被稱爲"市場搬運工",機構在影響任何股票價格動態方面具有重要影響力。因此,如果康菲石油的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能感到有必要賣出股票,這對個人投資者可能不是理想的選擇。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ConocoPhillips, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解康菲石油的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:COP Ownership Breakdown October 1st 2024
紐約交所:COP 2024年10月1日所有權拆分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ConocoPhillips?

機構持股告訴我們關於康菲石油的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that ConocoPhillips does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at ConocoPhillips' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到康菲石油確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的相當大一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定可信度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,查看康菲石油的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的事情。

big
NYSE:COP Earnings and Revenue Growth October 1st 2024
紐約交易所:COP盈利和營收增長2024年10月1日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ConocoPhillips. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.8% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要權力。我們注意到對康菲石油並沒有意義的對沖基金持有。先鋒集團公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有該公司9.4%的流通股。黑石集團公司是第二大股東,擁有公司普通股的8.3%,道富銀行全球貨幣投資公司持有約公司股份的4.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of ConocoPhillips

康菲石油內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of ConocoPhillips. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$99m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,康菲石油的內部人員擁有不到1%的股份。由於它是一家大公司,我們只希望內部人員擁有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值9900萬美元的股票。可以認爲最近的買賣行爲同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over ConocoPhillips. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有16%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對康菲石油有一定程度的影響。儘管擁有這麼大比例的股權,可能不足以改變公司政策,如果決定與其他大股東不一致。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand ConocoPhillips better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for ConocoPhillips (1 is a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解康菲石油,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了康菲石油的3個警示信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!),在投資這裏之前,您應該了解這些。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論