share_log

A Note On Aramark's (NYSE:ARMK) ROE and Debt To Equity

A Note On Aramark's (NYSE:ARMK) ROE and Debt To Equity

關於aramark(紐交所:ARMK)的roe和負債權益比的說明
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 23:07

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Aramark (NYSE:ARMK), by way of a worked example.

雖然一些投資者已經精通財務指標(致敬),本文是爲了那些想了解淨資產收益率(roe)以及其重要性的人。我們將使用roe來審視aramark(紐交所:armk),通過一個實例進行說明。

Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.

ROE(淨資產收益率)是股東需考慮的一個重要因素,因爲它告訴他們資本被有效地再投資的效果如何。換句話說,它揭示了公司將股東的投資轉化爲利潤的成功程度。

How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?

怎樣計算ROE?

Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:

股東權益報酬率可以使用以下公式計算:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Aramark is:

因此,根據上述公式,Aramark的ROE爲:

16% = US$474m ÷ US$3.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

16% = 4.74億美元 ÷ 30億美元(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. That means that for every $1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated $0.16 in profit.

「回報」是指公司在過去一年中的收益。這意味着對於每1美元的股東權益,公司產生了0.16美元的利潤。

Does Aramark Have A Good ROE?

Aramark的ROE好嗎?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Aramark has a similar ROE to the average in the Hospitality industry classification (16%).

可以說,評估公司的roe最簡單的方法是將其與行業平均水平進行比較。這種方法的侷限性在於,一些公司與其他公司相比有很大差異,即使在同一行業分類內。如果您查看下面的圖片,您會發現aramark的roe與餐飲行業分類的平均水平(16%)相似。

big
NYSE:ARMK Return on Equity October 1st 2024
紐交所:ARMk 2024年10月1日股東權益回報率

So while the ROE is not exceptional, at least its acceptable. While at least the ROE is not lower than the industry, its still worth checking what role the company's debt plays as high debt levels relative to equity may also make the ROE appear high. If a company takes on too much debt, it is at higher risk of defaulting on interest payments.

因此,儘管ROE並不出色,但至少是可接受的。至少ROE並未低於行業水平,但仍值得查看公司債務所起的作用,因爲相對於股權,較高的債務水平可能也會使ROE看起來很高。如果一家公司承擔了過多的債務,就更容易面臨利息支付違約的風險。

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

爲什麼在觀察ROE時你應該考慮債務問題?

Companies usually need to invest money to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.

公司通常需要投入資金來增加利潤。這筆資金可以來自留存收益、發行新股(資產)或債務。在前兩種選擇的情況下,roe將反映這種用於增長的資金。而在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將提高回報,但不會影響總資產。這將使roe看起來比不使用債務時更好。

Combining Aramark's Debt And Its 16% Return On Equity

結合Aramark公司的債務和16%的淨資產收益率

Aramark does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 2.01. There's no doubt its ROE is decent, but the very high debt the company carries is not too exciting to see. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.

Aramark確實使用大量債務來增加回報。它的債務與淨資產比率爲2.01。毫無疑問,它的淨資產收益率是可觀的,但公司承擔的高債務並不令人興奮。債務確實帶來額外的風險,因此只有在公司能夠從中獲得一些可觀回報時才真正值得。

Conclusion

結論

Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

對於比較不同業務質量的公司,ROE很有用。在我們的書中,最高質量的公司具有高ROE,儘管其債務較低。如果兩家公司的債務與股本比例大致相同,並且其中一家公司的ROE更高,我通常更喜歡ROE更高的那家公司。

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.

但是如果企業質量高,市場經常會將其出價至反映這一點的價格。還必須考慮利潤增長的預期相對於當前價格中反映的利潤增長預期的速度。因此,您可能會想要查看這家公司豐富數據的交互式預測圖表。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.

如果您想查看另一家可能具有更好財務狀況的公司 - 具有高股本回報率和低債務的公司,那麼請不要錯過這份有趣公司列表,該列表免費提供。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論