share_log

With 89% Institutional Ownership, AECOM (NYSE:ACM) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 89% Institutional Ownership, AECOM (NYSE:ACM) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有89%的機構所有權,AECOm(紐交所:ACM)在大型機構中備受青睞
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 20:31

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, AECOM's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 11 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在股票中所持有的大部分股份,AECOM的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前11大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of AECOM (NYSE:ACM), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 89% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解誰真正控制着AECOm(紐交所:ACM),重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。 機構持有了89%的股份,擁有公司中的最大股份。 換句話說,這個集團從他們對公司的投資中有望獲得最多(或損失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AECOM.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了AECOm的不同持股群體。

big
NYSE:ACM Ownership Breakdown October 1st 2024
紐交所:ACm所有權分佈2024年10月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AECOM?

機構持股告訴我們關於AECOM的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that AECOM does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AECOM, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到,AECOm確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票,並且喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出一支股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此,值得檢查AECOm的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:ACM Earnings and Revenue Growth October 1st 2024
紐交所:ACm營收和收入增長2024年10月1日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. AECOM is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are The Vanguard Group, Inc. and PRIMECAP Management Company, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.8%.

由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股票的一半,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。AECOm不是對沖基金持有的。BlackRock,Inc.目前是該公司的最大股東,持有13%的流通股。第二和第三大股東分別是The Vanguard Group,Inc.和PRIMECAP Management Company,持有相等比例的股份,均爲9.8%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的了解,我們發現前11名在該公司擁有51%的所有權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重要的控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of AECOM

AECOM的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that AECOM insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$64m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

根據我們的信息顯示,AECOm公司內部持有不到1%的股份。由於這是一家大公司,我們只期望內部持有微小的一部分。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值6400萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部持股總是好事,但值得注意的是可能需要檢查這些內部股東是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。雖然持股規模相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that AECOM is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

在考慮擁有公司的不同群體值得的同時,還有其他更重要的因素。請注意,AECOm在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,您應該了解...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論