share_log

Is MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) Using Too Much Debt?

Is MasTec (NYSE:MTZ) Using Too Much Debt?

MasTec(紐交所:MTZ)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 18:48

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, MasTec, Inc. (NYSE:MTZ) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:『波動性與風險並不等同。』因此顯而易見,當您考慮任何特定股票的風險性時,您需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。值得注意的是,MasTec公司(紐交所:MTZ)確實存在債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務帶來了多大風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,當公司無法通過籌集資本或利用自身現金流輕鬆償還債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能一無所獲。然而,更頻繁(但仍然成本高昂)的情況是,公司必須以極低的價格發行股份,永久性地稀釋股東權益,以維護其資產負債表。當然,有很多公司使用債務來支持增長,而沒有任何負面後果。在考慮公司的債務使用時,我們首先看現金和債務的總體情況。

What Is MasTec's Debt?

MasTec的債務是多少?

As you can see below, MasTec had US$2.27b of debt at June 2024, down from US$2.96b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$297.6m in cash leading to net debt of about US$1.97b.

正如您所看到的,MasTec在2024年6月的債務爲22.7億美元,較一年前的29.6億美元有所下降。另一方面,它有29760萬美元的現金,淨債務約爲19.7億美元。

big
NYSE:MTZ Debt to Equity History October 1st 2024
紐交所:MTZ負債股本比歷史數據2024年10月1日

A Look At MasTec's Liabilities

MasTec的負債情況

According to the last reported balance sheet, MasTec had liabilities of US$2.75b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$3.20b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$297.6m and US$2.88b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$2.77b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

根據最近披露的資產負債表,MasTec在12個月內到期的負債爲27.5億美元,超過12個月到期的負債爲32億美元。與此同時,它手頭有29760萬美元的現金和28.8億美元的一年內應收賬款。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收款的組合多出27.7億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because MasTec is worth US$9.57b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

這種赤字並不嚴重,因爲MasTec價值95.7億美元,因此可能能夠籌集足夠的資本來支持其資產負債表,如果有需要的話。但我們絕對希望密切關注其債務是否帶來過多風險。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

While MasTec has a quite reasonable net debt to EBITDA multiple of 2.4, its interest cover seems weak, at 1.1. The main reason for this is that it has such high depreciation and amortisation. While companies often boast that these charges are non-cash, most such businesses will therefore require ongoing investment (that is not expensed.) In any case, it's safe to say the company has meaningful debt. One way MasTec could vanquish its debt would be if it stops borrowing more but continues to grow EBIT at around 19%, as it did over the last year. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine MasTec's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

儘管MasTec的淨債務/EBITDA倍數爲2.4,但其利息保障倍數似乎較低,僅爲1.1。主要原因是它有如此高的折舊和攤銷費用。儘管公司常常吹噓這些費用是非現金的,但大多數這類企業因此需要持續投資(這並沒有支出)。無論如何,可以肯定該公司有實質性的債務。MasTec擺脫債務的一種方式是停止借款,但繼續以大約19%的速度增長EBIT,就像去年那樣。毫無疑問,我們大多數關於債務的了解都來自資產負債表。但最終確定MasTec能否保持健康資產負債表的能力,更多取決於未來收入。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師盈利預測的免費報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, MasTec actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces.

但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲一家公司無法用虛擬利潤支付債務;它需要現金。因此值得查看EBIT中有多少是由自由現金流支撐的。在過去的三年中,MasTec實際上產生的自由現金流比EBIT多。在保持向貸款人良好的關係方面,沒有什麼比即將到賬的現金更好的了。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, MasTec's impressive conversion of EBIT to free cash flow implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But we must concede we find its interest cover has the opposite effect. All these things considered, it appears that MasTec can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for MasTec you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.

高高興興地說,MasTec出色地將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流,這意味着它在債務方面佔據上風。但必須承認,我們發現其利息保障倍數產生了相反作用。綜合考慮所有這些因素,看來MasTec可以輕鬆處理其當前的債務水平。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增加股本回報,但也帶來更多風險,因此值得密切關注。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解到最多關於債務的信息。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表內,遠非如此。舉個例子:我們發現MasTec有3個警示信號,您應該注意,其中一個可能嚴重。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論