share_log

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 86% Institutional Ownership, Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

擁有86%的機構持股,泰克斯特龍公司(紐交所:TXT)備受大型機構青睞
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 18:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Textron implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在德事隆的大量持股意味着他們對該公司股價有重大影響
  • 前10大股東持有51%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

德事隆公司(紐交所:TXT)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 機構持有86%的股份,是該公司最大的股東。 換句話說,如果股價上漲(或者出現下滑),該群體將獲益最大(或者損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Textron.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於德事隆的情況。

big
NYSE:TXT Ownership Breakdown October 1st 2024
紐交所:德事隆所有權分佈2024年10月1日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Textron?

機構所有權對德事隆有何影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Textron already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Textron's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

德事隆的股東名單中已經有機構。確實,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都有可能會出錯一樣。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總存在着它們在一種「擁擠交易」中的風險。如果這樣的交易失敗,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到德事隆的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事還有更多內容。

big
NYSE:TXT Earnings and Revenue Growth October 1st 2024
紐交所:德事隆2024年10月1日的收益和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Textron. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.9% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.3% of the company stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要的影響力。我們注意到對沖基金在德事隆並無實質性投資。目前,先鋒集團是公司最大的股東,持有12%的股份。T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.是第二大股東,擁有公司普通股的8.9%,而BlackRock, Inc.持有公司約8.3%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Textron

德事隆的內部股東持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Textron Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$81m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義擁有德事隆公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此如果內部人士擁有該公司的大部分股份會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共計擁有價值8100萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但也值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Textron. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有德事隆的13% 股份。雖然這種持股量可能不足以使政策決策朝他們方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論