share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

持有83%股份,紐交所BLK被機構投資者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  10/01 03:09

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in BlackRock implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構對貝萊德的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響力
  • 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in BlackRock, Inc. (NYSE:BLK) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

紐交所:BLK)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。而擁有最大份額的是持有83%的機構。換句話說,該團體將從他們對公司的投資中獲得最大利潤(或者虧損)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about BlackRock.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於貝萊德的信息。

big
NYSE:BLK Ownership Breakdown September 30th 2024
紐約證券交易所:BLk 2024年9月30日的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BlackRock?

機構所有權告訴我們有關貝萊德的什麼信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

BlackRock already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of BlackRock, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

貝萊德已經有機構持有股份。實際上,他們在公司中擁有一定比例的股份,這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注過這支股票,並且他們很喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一支股票,很常見會出現股價大幅下跌的情況,因此值得查看貝萊德的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NYSE:BLK Earnings and Revenue Growth September 30th 2024
紐約證券交易所:貝萊德第四季度收入和營業收入增長於2024年9月30日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in BlackRock. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.9% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過半數已發行股份,董事會可能必須關注他們的偏好。對於貝萊德來說,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。目前,先鋒集團是該公司最大的股東,持有8.9%的股份。第二大股東持有約6.2%的已發行股份,第三大股東持有5.4%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 16 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

通過股東登記簿我們可以看到,16個最大的股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有一個股東擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of BlackRock

貝萊德的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that BlackRock, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$1.2b worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息顯示,貝萊德股份有限公司內部人士持有的股份不到公司的1%。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人士持有公司的較大比例將會令人驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值12億美元的股份(按目前的價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持股總是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

廣大公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司中擁有11%的持股,因此不能被輕視。雖然這個群體不能決定掌控權,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand BlackRock better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for BlackRock that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮到持有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。 但要更好地理解貝萊德,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如,我們發現了關於貝萊德的一個警告信號,您在進行投資之前應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論