International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company
International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 61% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies International Business Machines' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 25 shareholders own 40% of the company
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 機構持有的股權比例顯著較高,暗示着國際商用機器公司的股價對他們的交易行爲極爲敏感。
- 前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 40%。
- 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。
Every investor in International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 61% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
紐交所:IBM,每位在 International Business Machines Corporation (NYSE:IBM) 的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有大部分股份,佔比61%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將獲益最大(或者如果出現下行,將承擔最大損失)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構股東擁有巨大的資源池和流動資金,他們的投資決策往往承載着很大的權重,特別是對個人投資者來說。因此,機構投入該公司的資金通常是對其未來的極大信心。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of International Business Machines.
在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注國際商業機器公司不同的所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About International Business Machines?
機構股權持有情況告訴我們有關國際商業機器公司的什麼信息?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that International Business Machines does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at International Business Machines' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到國際商業機器有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。 這可能表明公司在投資社區具有一定的可信度。 但是,在依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證時最好謹慎。 他們有時也會出錯。 如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得看看國際商業機器的歷史收益情況。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. International Business Machines is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。國際商用機器公司不屬於對沖基金。現今最大的股東是先鋒集團,佔股份的9.7%。作爲背景資料,第二大股東持有約8.2%的股份,第三大股東持有5.9%的股份。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of International Business Machines
國際商業機器公司內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of International Business Machines Corporation in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$199m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的數據顯示,國際商用機器公司的內部持股不到1%。 由於規模如此之大,我們預計內部持有的股份比例不會很高。 總體來看,他們擁有價值1億9900萬美元的股票。 看到至少有一些內部持股總是件好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在賣出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆--包括零售投資者--擁有公司38%的股權,因此不能輕視。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在政策決策中左右局勢,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand International Business Machines better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for International Business Machines you should be aware of.
始終要考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解IBM,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。具體來說:我們發現IBM有1個警告信號,您應該注意。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。