Retail Investors in Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 13% Last Week
Retail Investors in Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 13% Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Waterdrop by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 56% ownership
- Insiders own 22% of Waterdrop
- 零售投資者對Waterdrop的重大控制意味着普通公衆在影響管理和治理決策方面具有更大的權力
- 共有3位投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔有56%的股權。
- 內部人員擁有Waterdrop 22%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Waterdrop Inc. (NYSE:WDH) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 27% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看Waterdrop Inc. (紐交所:WDH) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。零售投資者持有公司27%的股份,這意味着他們在該公司中擁有最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, retail investors were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.
因此,零售投資者是上週13%的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Waterdrop.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了水滴不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Waterdrop?
機構所有權告訴我們有關水滴的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
Waterdrop already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Waterdrop, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
水滴已經有機構進入股權登記簿。他們確實在公司中擁有一定的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定的可信度。然而,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們也有時候會犯錯。 如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一支股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。 所以值得檢查水滴的過去收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Waterdrop. The company's largest shareholder is Tencent Holdings Limited, with ownership of 22%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 22% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 12% by the third-largest shareholder. Peng Shen, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到對水滴沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。公司最大的股東是騰訊控股有限公司,持有22%的股份。爲了更好理解,第二大股東持有大約22%的流通股,第三大股東持有12%的股份。第二大股東彭參還兼任首席執行官。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.
對股東登記簿的更詳細研究向我們展示了三位最大的股東擁有56%的公司股份。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Waterdrop
水滴的內部人持有
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Waterdrop Inc.. Insiders have a US$95m stake in this US$435m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
看起來內部持有水滴公司的股份比例相當大。 內部人士在這家價值4.35億美元的公司中持有9500萬美元的股份。看到內部人員這麼投入這家企業真是太棒了。也許值得查看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
看起來私人公司擁有福建啓始集團有限責任公司44%的股權。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份擁有上市公司的利益。儘管很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With a stake of 12%, private equity firms could influence the Waterdrop board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
擁有12%股份的私募股權公司可能會影響水滴董事會。一些投資者可能會受到鼓舞,因爲私募股權公司有時能夠鼓勵市場看到該公司的價值。或者,這些持有人可能在將其公開上市後退出投資。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 4.3%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有該公司的4.3%股份。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人通過持有私人公司的股份而不是以個人身份參與公共公司,對公共公司產生利益影響。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但注意作爲進一步研究的一個領域還是值得的。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 22% of Waterdrop. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.
在我們看來,上市公司擁有水滴22%的股份。這可能是一種戰略利益,兩家公司可能有相關業務利益。他們可能已經進行了分拆。這種持股可能值得進一步調查。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.
雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。
I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。