QuantumScape Corporation's (NYSE:QS) Market Cap Touched US$3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions
QuantumScape Corporation's (NYSE:QS) Market Cap Touched US$3.0b Last Week, Benefiting Both Retail Investors Who Own 45% as Well as Institutions
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over QuantumScape by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 零售投資者對quantumscape擁有重要控制權,這意味着普通公衆擁有更多影響管理和治理決策的力量
- 前25大股東擁有該公司的49%。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
Every investor in QuantumScape Corporation (NYSE:QS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 45% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
紐交所(NYSE:QS)的每位QuantumScape Corporation投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體約佔45%,準確地說,是零售投資者。也就是說,如果股價上漲,他們將受益最多(或者如果出現下滑將承受最大損失)。
While retail investors were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 3.1% price gain, institutions also received a 28% cut.
儘管零售投資者是上週股價上漲3.1%後收益最大的一群,但機構也獲得了28%的份額。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about QuantumScape.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關quantumscape的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About QuantumScape?
機構持股量告訴我們有關QuantumScape的什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in QuantumScape. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see QuantumScape's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在quantumscape中持有相當數量的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在它們的交易過於擁擠的風險。當這樣一種交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到quantumscape的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in QuantumScape. Porsche Automobil Holding SE is currently the largest shareholder, with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.2% and 4.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Jagdeep Singh, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我們注意到,對於quantumscape,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。保時捷汽車控股SE目前是最大的股東,持有17%的股份。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的6.2%和4.0%。第三大股東Jagdeep Singh也恰好擔任董事會主席。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of QuantumScape
QuantumScape的內部人持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in QuantumScape Corporation. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$272m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有quantumscape公司的股票。 這是一家大公司,因此看到這種程度的一致性是件好事。 內部人士擁有價值27200萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。 但還是值得查看這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 45% stake in QuantumScape. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通民衆,通常是個人投資者,在quantumscape持有45%的股份。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以左右政策決定朝他們有利,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 17% of QuantumScape stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
公共公司目前擁有quantumscape股票的17%。很難確定,但這表明它們有交織的業務利益。這可能是戰略性股權,所以值得留意所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for QuantumScape (1 makes us a bit uncomfortable!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現了quantumscape的5個警示信號(其中1個讓我們感到有點不舒服!),在您投資之前應該意識到這一點。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。