The Recent 33% Gain Must Have Brightened Top Key Executive Ruben Minski's Week, Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 33% Gain Must Have Brightened Top Key Executive Ruben Minski's Week, Procaps Group S.A.'s (NASDAQ:PROC) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Procaps Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- 60% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 內部人員似乎對Procaps Group的增長有着切身利益,這可以從他們持有的大量股權看出
- 業務的60%由前3名股東持有
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Procaps Group S.A. (NASDAQ:PROC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 60% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果您想知道誰真正控制着Procaps Group S.A. (納斯達克: PROC),那麼您就需要查看其股東登記冊的構成。我們可以看到個別內部人員擁有公司的大部分份額,佔有60%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Clearly, insiders benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$62m last week.
顯然,在上週公司市值上漲6200萬美元后,內部人員受益最多。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Procaps Group.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Procaps Group的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Procaps Group?
機構持股缺失對Procaps Group有何啓示?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Procaps Group might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
有很多可能導致機構不持有公司股份的原因。通常,小型新上市公司不會引起基金經理的關注,因爲大型基金經理不太可能在公司中建立重要職位。另外,可能是有關公司的某些因素使機構投資者遠離。Procaps Group可能沒有機構正在尋找的過去業績,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究過該業務。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Procaps Group. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Procaps Group's case, its Top Key Executive, Ruben Minski, is the largest shareholder, holding 28% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Deseja Trust and Jose Gontovnik, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 16%. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Jose Gontovnik is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.
我們注意到,對Procaps Group的投資並不具有實質性意義。因爲行動勝於言辭,當內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份時,我們認爲這是一個好跡象。在Procaps Group的情況下,其最高主要執行官Ruben Minski是最大的股東,持有公司28%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是Deseja Trust和Jose Gontovnik,他們名下的股份數量相同,均爲16%。有趣的是,第三大股東Jose Gontovnik也是董事會主席,再次表明公司最大股東之間存在強大的內部持股。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Procaps Group
Procaps集團內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems that insiders own more than half the Procaps Group S.A. stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a US$150m stake in this US$252m business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部持股人擁有超過Procaps Group S.A.股份的一半。 這給他們很大的權力。 因此,他們在這家市值25200萬美元的企業中擁有1.5億美元的股份。 大多數人會認爲這是一個積極的信號,表明他們與股東有很強的一致性。 您可以點擊這裏查看內部持股人是否一直在買賣。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 17% stake in Procaps Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在Procaps Group持有17%的股份。 儘管擁有這樣規模的股權可能不足以影響政策決定朝着他們的方向,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 7.5%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
持有7.5%股權的私募基金機構有能力在塑造企業策略方面發揮作用,專注於創造價值。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時是讓管理層負責的激進分子。但有時候,私募股權出售部分股份,將公司上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Procaps Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
Procaps集團股份私有公司擁有16%。私有公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人員通過私有公司持有一家上市公司的股權,而不是以個人身份擁有。雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 4 warning signs for Procaps Group you should be aware of, and 1 of them shouldn't be ignored.
我覺得查看公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現Procaps集團有4個警告信號,您應該注意其中的1個。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。