share_log

With 43% Ownership in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 43% Ownership in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在SFL Corporation Ltd.(紐交所:SFL)中擁有43%的股權,機構投資者對該業務寄予厚望
Simply Wall St ·  09/28 21:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in SFL implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構在SFL的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

Every investor in SFL Corporation Ltd. (NYSE:SFL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 43% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

SFL Corporation Ltd.(紐交所:SFL)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司43%的股權,換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的潛在上漲空間(或下行風險)。

And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.6b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 13%.

上週,公司市值達到了16億美元,機構投資者成爲受益最多的一群。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲13%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about SFL.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對SFL能提供什麼信息。

big
NYSE:SFL Ownership Breakdown September 28th 2024
紐交所:SFL 2024年9月28日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About SFL?

機構所有權告訴我們SFL有什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in SFL. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see SFL's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在SFL中持有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究過這支股票並且他們喜歡。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會有一種風險,即它們正在進行一種'擁擠交易'。當這種交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到SFL的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事中總是更多的內容。

big
NYSE:SFL Earnings and Revenue Growth September 28th 2024
紐交所:SFL盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月28日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in SFL. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Greenwich Holdings Ltd. with 19% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 6.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, DNB Asset Management AS and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders.

對沖基金在SFL中沒有太多股票。查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Greenwich Holdings Ltd.持有19%的股份。分別持有8.8%和6.7%的股份,DNb Asset Management AS和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP是第二和第三大股東。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據的進一步研究表明,前13大股東擁有51%的股份,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of SFL

SFL的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of SFL Corporation Ltd. in their own names. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$1.6m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的數據顯示,SFL Corporation Ltd.的內部持有者以自己的名義名下不到1%的股份。但他們可能通過我們尚未發現的公司結構間接持有利益。 這是一家大公司,因此即使是小比例的利益也可以在董事會和股東之間產生協調。 在這種情況下,內部持有者擁有價值160萬美元的股票。看到至少一些內部持有總是件好事,但值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 38% stake in SFL. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,在SFL持有38%的股份。 雖然這個群體不能必然控制局面,但肯定能對公司的運作產生實質影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the SFL stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

看起來,私人公司擁有SFL股票的19%。這可能值得深入研究。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬人公司中有利益,那應該在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for SFL that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查看一家公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了SFL的2個警示信號,您在投資之前應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論