share_log

With 86% Ownership of the Shares, Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 86% Ownership of the Shares, Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

憑藉對86%股份的擁有,Intuit Inc. (納斯達克:INTU)嚴重受到機構所有者的控制。
Simply Wall St ·  09/27 20:52

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Intuit's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 22 shareholders
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構擁有的股份佔比極高,意味着適銳公司的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 22家最大的股東持有該企業的50%股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Intuit Inc. (NASDAQ:INTU), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Intuit Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:INTU),那麼您需要查看其股東註冊情況。 機構持有86%的股份在公司中佔比最高。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,則該集團將受益最大(或者如果出現下行,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Intuit, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Intuit的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:INTU Ownership Breakdown September 27th 2024
納斯達克:INTU 2024年9月27日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Intuit?

機構投資者持股量對Intuit有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Intuit. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Intuit, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Intuit擁有相當多的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Intuit的過去收益軌跡(以下)。當然,也要牢記還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NasdaqGS:INTU Earnings and Revenue Growth September 27th 2024
納斯達克GS:INTU盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月27日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Intuit. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.4% of shares outstanding. BlackRock, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 4.3% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠強烈影響董事會的決定。我們注意到對沖基金在Intuit中沒有明顯的投資。標普500指數公司目前是公司最大的股東,持有9.4%的流通股。BlackRock公司是第二大股東,擁有8.7%的普通股,道富銀行全球顧問公司持有約4.3%的公司股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 22 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更多的研究,我們發現前22家公司合共佔有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Intuit

Intuit內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Intuit Inc.. Insiders own US$4.7b worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東可能會有興趣了解,內部人士擁有Intuit Inc.的股票。 內部人士擁有價值47億美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。看到這種投資水平是好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部人員最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽略。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Intuit , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,考慮投資風險這個永遠存在的幽靈。我們已經在Intuit發現了1個警告信號,理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論