share_log

CME Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CME) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company

CME Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CME) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 89% of the Company

cme集團公司(納斯達克:CME)絕大部分由持有公司89%股份的機構股東控制
Simply Wall St ·  09/26 20:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies CME Group's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 23 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持股比例顯著高,意味着芝加哥商品交易所的股價對它們的交易行爲敏感。
  • 共有23名投資者持有公司的絕大多數股份,擁有51%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of CME Group Inc. (NASDAQ:CME) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 89% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下芝加哥商品交易所股份的股東可以告訴我們哪個團體最有權力。我們可以看到,機構持有公司89%的股權。換句話說,該團體有望從他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about CME Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關芝加哥商品交易所的信息。

big
NasdaqGS:CME Ownership Breakdown September 26th 2024
NasdaqGS:CME所有權拆分2024年9月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CME Group?

機構持股對CME Group的意義是什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

CME Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at CME Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

芝加哥商品交易所已經有機構在股東名冊上。確實,他們在公司擁有一定比例的股份。這表明在專業投資者中擁有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這個事實,因爲有時機構做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做出的一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的芝加哥商品交易所的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:CME Earnings and Revenue Growth September 26th 2024
納斯達克納斯達克集團:CME盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月26日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in CME Group. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.3%. The second and third largest shareholders are Capital Research and Management Company and BlackRock, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.2%.

由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股份的一半,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對芝加哥商品交易所沒有實質性投資的對沖基金。公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有9.3%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是Capital Research and Management Company和BlackRock, Inc.,他們名下擁有相同數量的股份,各佔7.2%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 23 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到23個頂級股東控制了51%的所有權,這意味着沒有任何一個股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of CME Group

CME Group內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of CME Group Inc. in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$264m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的數據顯示,內部持有芝加哥商品交易所公司的股份不到1%。由於這是一家大公司,我們只希望內部持有的比例很小。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值2.64億美元的股份。看到董事會成員持有股份是好事,但值得注意的是這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in CME Group. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般大衆,通常是個人投資者,在芝加哥商品交易所持有10%的股份。雖然這個群體不能確定地左右公司的決策,但他們的確可以對公司運營產生實質影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CME Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - CME Group has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

考慮到擁有一家公司股份的不同股東群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解芝加哥商品交易所,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。比如說風險-芝加哥商品交易所有2個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論