share_log

Retail Investors Who Hold 37% of Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (NYSE:HG) Gained 9.8%, Institutions Profited as Well

Retail Investors Who Hold 37% of Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (NYSE:HG) Gained 9.8%, Institutions Profited as Well

持有漢密爾頓保險集團有限公司(紐交所:HG)37%股份的零售投資者獲得了9.8%的收益,機構也獲利。
Simply Wall St ·  09/26 20:34

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant control over Hamilton Insurance Group by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Hamilton Insurance Group is 26%
  • 零售投資者對漢密爾頓保險集團的重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多影響管理和治理決策的權力
  • 前10大股東持有51%的股份。
  • 漢密爾頓保險集團的機構持股比例爲26%

A look at the shareholders of Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd. (NYSE:HG) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 37% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下漢密爾頓保險集團有限公司(紐交所: HG)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權勢。持有該公司股份數量最多的群體,準確地說約爲37%,是零售投資者。換句話說,該群體在他們投資該公司時最有可能獲益(或損失)最多。

Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched US$1.9b last week, while institutions who own 26% also benefitted.

零售投資者在上週市值達到19億美元后獲得了最多收益,而持有26%股份的機構也受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hamilton Insurance Group.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對漢密爾頓保險集團能告訴我們什麼。

big
NYSE:HG Ownership Breakdown September 26th 2024
紐交所:HG 2024年9月26日的股權結構分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hamilton Insurance Group?

機構持股情況能告訴我們關於漢密爾頓保險集團的哪些信息?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Hamilton Insurance Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Hamilton Insurance Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到漢密爾頓保險集團確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當比例股票。這可能表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會出錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在它們正在進行的'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這個風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到漢密爾頓保險集團的歷史收益和營業收入如下,但請記住故事永遠不止這些。

big
NYSE:HG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 26th 2024
紐交所:HG 2024年9月26日的盈利和營業收入增長

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 15% of Hamilton Insurance Group. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Magnitude Capital, LLC with 15% of shares outstanding. With 9.9% and 9.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Hopkins Holdings, LLC and Sango Hoken Holdings, LLC are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Giuseppina Albo directly holds 0.7% of the total shares outstanding.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有漢密爾頓保險集團15%的股份。 這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍和激進。 許多人尋找中期激勵因素,這將推高股價。 根據我們的數據,最大的股東是Magnitude Capital, LLC,持有15%的流通股。 Hopkins Holdings, LLC和Sango Hoken Holdings, LLC分別持有流通股的9.9%和9.5%,是第二和第三大的股東。此外,該公司的CEO Giuseppina Albo直接持有總流通股的0.7%。

We also observed that the top 10 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前10大股東持有超過半數股份,有一些較小的股東以一定程度上平衡更大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Hamilton Insurance Group

漢密爾頓保險集團的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$50m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

We can see that insiders own shares in Hamilton Insurance Group, Ltd.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$5000萬. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hamilton Insurance Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

With a 37% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hamilton Insurance Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 19%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同團體確實值得,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現第一太平有2個警示信號非常值得考慮,其中1個潛在嚴重。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Hamilton Insurance Group you should be aware of.

我覺得看一下公司的實際持有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如:我們發現漢密爾頓保險集團存在一個警告信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論