share_log

With 74% Institutional Ownership, Corning Incorporated (NYSE:GLW) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 74% Institutional Ownership, Corning Incorporated (NYSE:GLW) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

康寧公司(紐交所:GLW)擁有74%的機構所有權,是大鱷們中的寵兒
Simply Wall St ·  09/26 18:36

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Corning's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構持有股份比例較高意味着康寧股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Corning Incorporated (NYSE:GLW) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 74% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

康寧公司(紐交所:GLW)的股東構成可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。 持有該公司最多股份的群體,準確地說約佔該公司股份的74%,是機構。 也就是說,如果股價上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下行,則損失最大)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Corning.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了康寧的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:GLW Ownership Breakdown September 26th 2024
紐交所:GLW 所有權佔比2024年9月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Corning?

機構持有情況對我們康寧有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Corning does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Corning's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到康寧確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司相當一部分的股份。這表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們也有時會出錯。當多家機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們可能處於'擁擠交易'中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能爭相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看康寧的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲豐富的。

big
NYSE:GLW Earnings and Revenue Growth September 26th 2024
紐交所:康寧2024年9月26日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Corning. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.0% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過半數的公司股份,因此他們可以集體施加重要影響力。我們注意到,對康寧而言,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是前哨集團,佔有11%的股權。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有待售股份的9.0%和7.3%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

通過股權調查,我們發現前13名股東在公司中擁有50%的股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Corning

康寧的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Corning Incorporated. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$127m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

最新數據顯示,康寧公司內部持有的股份不到1%。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不會指望內部持有股份的比例很高。他們總共持有1.27億美元的股票。在這種情況下,看看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出股票可能更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 16% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的普通大衆擁有該公司16%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這種所有權的大小可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 9.0% of Corning stock. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

公共公司目前擁有康寧股票的9.0%。很難確定,但這表明它們擁有交織的業務利益。 這可能是一種戰略持股,因此值得關注所有權變化的情況。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Corning (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有公司的不同群體是很值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。 例如,我們已經確定了康寧的4個警示標誌(1個不容忽視),您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論