share_log

With 56% Ownership of the Shares, Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 56% Ownership of the Shares, Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

凱明有限公司(紐交所:GRMN)的股權佔比達56%,機構持有者佔據主導地位。
Simply Wall St ·  09/25 22:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Garmin implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在佳明的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響力。
  • 共有12名投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of Garmin Ltd. (NYSE:GRMN) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 56% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下紐交所上佳明有限公司(NYSE:GRMN)的股東,我們可以判斷哪個群體更具影響力。擁有56%股份,機構擁有公司中最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Garmin.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Garmin的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:GRMN Ownership Breakdown September 25th 2024
紐交所:GRMN於2024年9月25日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Garmin?

機構擁有權告訴我們關於Garmin的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Garmin does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Garmin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Garmin確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像任何人一樣。當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險會更高。您可以查看Garmin的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事絕不止這些。

big
NYSE:GRMN Earnings and Revenue Growth September 25th 2024
紐交所:佳明2024年9月25日的收益和營業收入增長

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Garmin. Our data suggests that Min-Hwan Kao, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 9.5%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Jonathan Burrell and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.3%.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會很可能要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到,對於佳明公司,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據表明,高敏煌,也是公司的首席關鍵執行官,持有9.5%的股份。當內部人持有大量公司股份時,投資者會認爲這是一個積極的跡象,因爲這表明內部人願意把他們的財富與公司的未來聯繫起來。第二和第三大股東是喬納森·伯雷爾和上舡集團,他們名下的股份數量相等,均爲9.3%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Garmin

Garmin的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Garmin Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$34b, and insiders have US$6.4b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

看起來內部持股佔據佳明有限公司的相當大份額。其市值僅爲340億美元,內部人員擁有64億美元的股份。這相當可觀。大多數人會說這顯示了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。可以點擊這裏查看內部是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 25% stake in Garmin. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有佳明25%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右對他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Garmin better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Garmin is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

始終值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解佳明,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,佳明顯示出1個警示信號,你應該知道……

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論