share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) With 74% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) With 74% Ownership

機構投資者對紐交所GWW公司持有74%的股權投入了很多
Simply Wall St ·  09/25 00:28

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in W.W. Grainger implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 14 shareholders
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構對美國固安捷的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重大影響力
  • 前14名股東持有該公司業務的50%。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of W.W. Grainger, Inc. (NYSE:GWW) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 74% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

觀察美國固安捷公司(紐交所: GWW)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力量。我們可以看到機構在公司擁有74%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 3.4% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 52% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

結果,機構投資者在上週公司股價上漲3.4%後獲得了最豐厚的回報。目前一年投資回報率爲52%,上週的收益將會受到熱烈歡迎。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about W.W. Grainger.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對美國固安捷可以告訴我們什麼。

big
NYSE:GWW Ownership Breakdown September 24th 2024
紐交所:GWW所有權拆分2024年9月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About W.W. Grainger?

機構所有權對W.W. Grainger有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in W.W. Grainger. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at W.W. Grainger's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在美國固安捷中持有相當數量的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面的美國固安捷的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:GWW Earnings and Revenue Growth September 24th 2024
紐交所:GWW盈利與營收增長2024年9月24日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. W.W. Grainger is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.1% and 8.4%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股份,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。固安捷不被對沖基金所擁有。先鋒集團目前是該公司最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。與此同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的9.1%和8.4%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 14 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東登記冊上可以看到,前14大股東控制着50%的所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of W.W. Grainger

W.W. Grainger的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in W.W. Grainger, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$4.7b. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,W.W. Grainger, Inc.的內部持有人擁有一些股份。 內部持有人持有價值47億美元的股份。 我們有時會對他們是在買入還是賣出感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over W.W. Grainger. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

持有16%股權的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對W.W. Grainger擁有一定的影響力。 儘管這種所有權規模可觀,但如果決定與其他大股東不一致,可能無法改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that W.W. Grainger is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

我發現查看公司的所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。請注意,美國固安捷在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告標誌,您應該了解...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論