share_log

With 89% Ownership of the Shares, AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE:AME) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 89% Ownership of the Shares, AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE:AME) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

持有89%股份,AMETEk,Inc.(紐交所:AME)由機構持有者主導。
Simply Wall St ·  09/21 20:13

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in AMETEK implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 16 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構對阿美特克股票的實質性持有意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力。
  • 總共有16家投資者擁有該公司的大部分股權,佔50%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of AMETEK, Inc. (NYSE:AME) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看阿美特克公司的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最有力。在該公司中持有最多股份的群體,大約佔89%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險) 。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AMETEK.

在下圖中,我們放大了阿美特克的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:AME Ownership Breakdown September 21st 2024
紐交所:AME所有權拆分2024年9月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AMETEK?

機構持有情況能告訴我們哪些關於阿美特克的事情。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

AMETEK already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see AMETEK's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

阿美特克股東名冊上已經有機構。他們在公司擁有相當可觀的股份。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽。 但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。 他們有時也會犯錯。 當多家機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們處於「擁擠交易」中的風險。 當這樣的交易出現問題時,可能有多方競相快速賣出股票。 這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以查看阿美特克的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。

big
NYSE:AME Earnings and Revenue Growth September 21st 2024
紐交所:阿美特克2024年9月21日的收益和營業收入增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. AMETEK is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 11%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.6% and 4.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,所以它們可能會對董事會決策產生強大影響力。阿美特克並不被對沖基金所擁有。該公司最大的股東是領先集團,持股比例爲11%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.6%和4.1%的流通股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們的所有權數字顯示,前16名股東的所有權總計佔50%,這意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of AMETEK

阿美特克的內部股權情況。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of AMETEK, Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$158m worth of shares (at current prices). In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據顯示,阿美特克公司在內部人名下的持股比例低於1%。由於該公司規模非常龐大,所以看到內部人持有大比例的股份會讓人感到驚訝。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同持有價值1.58億美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人是否一直在買賣股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有公司的10%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在其方面左右政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論