RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 81%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies RLI's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 13 shareholders own 51% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構擁有的股份比例顯著高,意味着rli保險的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前13大股東擁有公司的51%股份。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of RLI Corp. (NYSE:RLI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看RLI Corp.(紐交所:RLI)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。 公司中持有最多股份的群體,準確地說是約81%,是機構。 換句話說,該群體可以從他們投資公司獲得最大利潤(或蒙受最大損失)。
Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構有許多資金,因此他們的市場走勢往往會受到零售或個人投資者的密切關注。因此,機構投資公司的良好部分通常是對其未來充滿信心的重要標誌。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of RLI, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解RLI的每一種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RLI?
機構持有情況如何反映RLI?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that RLI does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RLI's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到RLI確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當大部分股票。 這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。 但是,最好警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂驗證。 他們有時也會犯錯誤。 當多家機構持有一隻股票時,存在它們可能涉及的風險,即處於「擁擠交易」中。 當這種交易出錯時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。 這種風險在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。 您可以在下方看到RLI的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更加複雜。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RLI. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.9% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.5% and 7.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會強烈影響董事會的決定。對於RLI,對沖基金並沒有太多股份。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,Inc.是最大的股東,持有9.9%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有9.5%和7.9%的流通股。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
經過更加深入的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東在該公司擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of RLI
RLI保險內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in RLI Corp.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$270m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以報告說,內部持有rli保險股票。內部持有的股份價值爲2.7億美元。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。 大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會之間的利益一致。 儘管如此,值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股票。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此他們不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種擁有量可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with RLI (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現查看公司的股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮投資風險這個永遠存在的威脅。我們已經確定了rli保險的2個警示信號(至少有1個不容忽視),理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。