share_log

There Are Reasons To Feel Uneasy About Marten Transport's (NASDAQ:MRTN) Returns On Capital

There Are Reasons To Feel Uneasy About Marten Transport's (NASDAQ:MRTN) Returns On Capital

對於馬爾登運輸(納斯達克:MRTN)的資本回報率有不安的原因
Simply Wall St ·  09/20 19:08

If you're looking for a multi-bagger, there's a few things to keep an eye out for. Ideally, a business will show two trends; firstly a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an increasing amount of capital employed. Basically this means that a company has profitable initiatives that it can continue to reinvest in, which is a trait of a compounding machine. However, after briefly looking over the numbers, we don't think Marten Transport (NASDAQ:MRTN) has the makings of a multi-bagger going forward, but let's have a look at why that may be.

如果您正在尋找一支多包的股票,有幾件事情需要注意。理想情況下,一家企業會展示兩種趨勢;首先是不斷增長的資本回報率(ROCE),其次是不斷增加的資本運用量。基本上這意味着公司有盈利的計劃,可以繼續投資,這是複利機器的特徵。然而,經過簡要的數字審查後,我們認爲馬爾登運輸(納斯達克:MRTN)未來不具備成爲多包股票的潛質,但讓我們來看看可能的原因。

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What Is It?

資本僱用回報率(ROCE)是什麼?

For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. Analysts use this formula to calculate it for Marten Transport:

對於不清楚什麼是ROCE的人,它衡量的是一家公司從其業務中使用的資本中可以產生的稅前利潤金額。分析師使用這個公式爲馬爾登運輸計算ROCE:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資產僱用回報率(ROCE)是指企業利潤,即企業稅前利潤除以企業投入的總資本(負債加股權)。如果ROCE高於企業財務成本的承受能力,那麼企業就會創造出更多的價值。

0.052 = US$47m ÷ (US$1.0b - US$119m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

0.052 = 4.7億美元 ÷ (100億美元 - 1.19億美元)(基於2024年6月至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

Thus, Marten Transport has an ROCE of 5.2%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Transportation industry average of 7.7%.

因此,馬爾登運輸的ROCE爲5.2%。就絕對值而言,這是一個較低的回報率,也低於運輸行業平均水平的7.7%。

big
NasdaqGS:MRTN Return on Capital Employed September 20th 2024
納斯達克:MRTN 2024年9月20日資本運用回報率

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Marten Transport compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like to see what analysts are forecasting going forward, you should check out our free analyst report for Marten Transport .

以上是馬爾登運輸當前的資本回報率(ROCE)與以往資本回報率的比較,但僅憑過去看到的信息有限。如果您想了解分析師對未來的預測,請查看我們爲馬爾登運輸提供的免費分析師報告。

How Are Returns Trending?

綜合上述,Cimpress非常有效地提高了其資本利用率所產生的回報。考慮到股票過去五年保持穩定,如果其他指標也不錯,則可能存在機會。因此,進一步研究這家公司並確定這些趨勢是否會持續是合理的。

On the surface, the trend of ROCE at Marten Transport doesn't inspire confidence. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 9.8%, but since then they've fallen to 5.2%. Given the business is employing more capital while revenue has slipped, this is a bit concerning. If this were to continue, you might be looking at a company that is trying to reinvest for growth but is actually losing market share since sales haven't increased.

表面上看,馬爾登運輸的ROCE趨勢並不令人信心滿滿。大約五年前,資本回報率爲9.8%,但此後已下降至5.2%。鑑於企業在資本投入增加的同時,營業收入有所下滑,這令人有些擔憂。如果這種情況繼續下去,您可能會看到一家正在試圖爲增長重新投資但實際上失去了市場份額的公司,因爲銷售額沒有增加。

The Bottom Line On Marten Transport's ROCE

馬爾登運輸ROCE的要點

We're a bit apprehensive about Marten Transport because despite more capital being deployed in the business, returns on that capital and sales have both fallen. Investors must expect better things on the horizon though because the stock has risen 39% in the last five years. Either way, we aren't huge fans of the current trends and so with that we think you might find better investments elsewhere.

我們對馬爾登運輸有些擔憂,因爲儘管企業投入更多資本,但資本回報率和銷售額都有所下降。投資者必須對未來有更好的期望,因爲股價在過去五年已上漲了39%。無論如何,我們並不是當前趨勢的鐵桿粉絲,因此我們認爲您可能會在其他地方找到更好的投資。

On a separate note, we've found 1 warning sign for Marten Transport you'll probably want to know about.

另外,我們發現了針對馬爾登運輸的1個警示信號,您可能想了解一下。

While Marten Transport isn't earning the highest return, check out this free list of companies that are earning high returns on equity with solid balance sheets.

雖然馬爾登運輸的回報率並不是最高的,請查看這份免費公司列表,這些公司以實力雄厚的資產負債表獲得了高回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論