share_log

Institutional Investors Control 68% of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:WASH) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 11%

Institutional Investors Control 68% of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:WASH) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 11%

華盛頓信託銀行的68%股權由機構投資者控制,上週股價上漲11%,機構投資者因此獲得回報
Simply Wall St ·  09/20 18:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Washington Trust Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 考慮到機構在該股票中所佔的大股比例,華盛頓信託銀行的股票價格可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前13名股東佔該公司50%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:WASH), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 68% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

爲了了解誰真正掌控着華盛頓信託銀行股份有限公司(NASDAQ:WASH),理解該企業的所有權結構非常重要。 機構持有該公司的最多股份,佔比68%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲益最多(或者如果市場出現不利行情,則損失最大)。

Last week's 11% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 38% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週的11%漲幅意味着機構投資者處於正面的態勢,即使公司在長期趨勢上也表現出色。股東的一年回報率目前爲38%,上週的漲幅是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Washington Trust Bancorp, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究華盛頓信託銀行的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:WASH Ownership Breakdown September 20th 2024
納斯達克:WASH 2024年9月20日所有權分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Washington Trust Bancorp?

機構所有權對華盛頓信託銀行告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Washington Trust Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Washington Trust Bancorp, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

華盛頓信託銀行已經有機構在股東名冊上。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲有時候機構也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人都會一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,那麼股價就會出現大幅下跌的情況,並不罕見。因此,值得注意的是,要檢查華盛頓信託銀行過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,還要考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqGS:WASH Earnings and Revenue Growth September 20th 2024
納斯達克GS:華盛頓信託銀行2024年9月20日營收和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Washington Trust Bancorp. The company's largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc., with ownership of 13%. FMR LLC is the second largest shareholder owning 8.0% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 5.6% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要的影響力。對於華盛頓信託銀行,對沖基金並沒有很多股份。該公司最大的股東是BlackRock,佔13%的股份。FMR LLC是第二大股東,持有8%的普通股,而The Vanguard Group, Inc.持有公司5.6%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

通過股權調查,我們發現前13名股東在公司中擁有50%的股權,表明沒有單一股東對該公司具有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股比例是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。同樣可以通過研究分析師情緒來實現。由於相當多的分析師都關注着該股票,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of Washington Trust Bancorp

華盛頓信託銀行的內部投資者所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$12m worth of stock in the US$560m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

股東們可能會感興趣地了解到,華盛頓信託銀行的股票中有內部人士持有股份。內部人士以自己的名義持有了價值1200萬美元的股票,佔了這家總市值爲5600萬美元的公司的一部分。能看到內部人員有一些投資是好事,但值得檢查的是這些內部人士是否一直在買入股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,包括散戶,擁有公司29%的股權,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面左右一個決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Washington Trust Bancorp better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Washington Trust Bancorp , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

值得考慮的是公司的股東群體。爲了更好地了解華盛頓信託銀行,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,需要考慮投資風險的無處不在的陰影。我們已經確定了與華盛頓信託銀行有關的1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論