share_log

Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

Individual Investors Who Own 44% Along With Institutions Invested in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week

個人投資者和機構擁有的亨氏集團(新加坡交易所:J36)投資者上週看到其持有價值的增長
Simply Wall St ·  09/20 15:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Jardine Matheson Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 賈丁馬遜集團的個人投資者持有大量股份,表明他們在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權。
  • 前12名股東持有該業務的50%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited (SGX:J36), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想了解誰真正控制着賈丁馬遜控股有限公司(SGX:J36),那麼你就需要看一下其股東登記冊的構成。我們可以看到,個人投資者擁有該公司44%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該集團將獲得最大利益(或者如果股價下跌會蒙受最大損失)。

While individual investors were the group that benefitted the most from last week's US$375m market cap gain, institutions too had a 37% share in those profits.

儘管個人投資者是上週市值增長3.75億美元中收益最多的群體,但機構也持有其中37%的股份。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Jardine Matheson Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Jardine Matheson Holdings的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
SGX:J36 Ownership Breakdown September 20th 2024
SGX:J36 所有權結構2024年9月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jardine Matheson Holdings?

機構持股能告訴我們關於Jardine Matheson Holdings的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Jardine Matheson Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Jardine Matheson Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Jardine Matheson Holdings確實有機構投資者,並持有公司股票的很大一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多家機構同時改變他們對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看Jardine Matheson Holdings的下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
SGX:J36 Earnings and Revenue Growth September 20th 2024
新加坡交易所: J36盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月20日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Jardine Matheson Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is Butterfield Asset Management Ltd., with ownership of 14%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

我們注意到,對於佳爾敦數控的投資,對沖基金沒有一個有意義的投資。 該公司最大的股東是巴特菲爾德資產管理有限公司,持有14%的股份。 背景資料顯示,第二大股東持有約13%的流通股,緊隨其後的第三大股東持股5.1%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過一些調查,我們發現前12名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Jardine Matheson Holdings

佳爾敦數控的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Jardine Matheson Holdings Limited. It is a very large company, and board members collectively own US$730m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到賈丹·因和敦·麥迪遜控股有限公司的內部人員擁有股份。 這是一家非常大的公司,董事會成員集體擁有價值7億3千萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會的利益一致。 不過,值得檢查內部人員是否一直在出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Jardine Matheson Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在賈丹·因和敦·麥迪遜控股公司持有44%的股份。 儘管這個群體不能決定一切事務,但確實對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Jardine Matheson Holdings stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

似乎私人公司擁有佳世客子公司13%的股票。我們可能需要進一步深入研究。如果與這些私人公司相關的方面,如內部人員,在公司年度報告中應該進行披露。私人公司可能對該公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Jardine Matheson Holdings that you should be aware of.

雖然考慮擁有該公司的不同集團確實很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了對佳世客子公司產生警示信號的4個方面,你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論