share_log

With 88% Ownership, Conagra Brands, Inc. (NYSE:CAG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 88% Ownership, Conagra Brands, Inc. (NYSE:CAG) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有88%的所有權,康尼格拉品牌公司(紐交所:CAG)擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 23:17

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Conagra Brands' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 分析師將康尼格拉品牌的股價與機構的交易行爲聯繫在一起,高比例的機構持股意味着其股價對機構的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in Conagra Brands, Inc. (NYSE:CAG) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 88% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

每個投資者都應該了解康尼格拉品牌股份有限公司(紐交所:CAG)的最大股東群體。機構持有88%的股份,佔公司的最大比例。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構具有龐大的資本量,他們的市場動作往往會受到零售或個人投資者的高度關注。因此,在一家公司中擁有大量機構投資往往被視爲一個理想的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Conagra Brands.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大康尼格拉不同的所有權群體。

big
NYSE:CAG Ownership Breakdown September 18th 2024
紐交所:CAG 2024年9月18日所有權細分

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Conagra Brands?

機構所有權告訴我們有關康尼格拉的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Conagra Brands already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Conagra Brands' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

康尼格拉已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司擁有相當大的一部分股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅憑這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注康尼格拉下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:CAG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 18th 2024
紐交所:CAG在2024年9月18日的營收和利潤增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Conagra Brands is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.9% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能能夠對董事會決策產生強大的影響力。康尼格拉品牌不是由對沖基金擁有的。公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有12%的股權。爲了了解背景,第二大股東持有約9.9%的流通股份,第三大股東持有4.8%的股權。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of Conagra Brands

康尼格拉品牌內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Conagra Brands, Inc.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$79m worth of shares. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

根據我們最近的數據顯示,康尼格拉品牌公司的內部股東持有少於1%的股份。作爲一家大公司,我們只希望內部股東擁有一小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值7,900萬美元的股份。可以點擊這裏查看內部股東的買賣情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司12%的股權,因此不能被忽視。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以爲他們爭取政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Conagra Brands that you should be aware of.

我覺得查看一個公司的股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現康尼格拉品牌存在5個警告信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論